Ken Wilber - I Am Big Mind

The I am is not said to be separate from objects, but can be pointed out in a state of consciousness in which bliss, a subject, alone arises, but object arises. Nondually, subjects and objects are not two.

It is not clinging. It is a pointing out. I am is just a name, even in hinduism and in kriya yoga.

True 3D vision, 360 degrees, but it takes a little 'meditation'.

There is remote viewing. I can see behind walls.

Remote viewing, which I do, astral travel, which I don't - these point to information having a sort of coherence even beyond the five senses, buddy.

Why is he assuming that without a brain you feel iamness? he has no way to know this but he is so sure...

Near death experiences - when the body is completely dead, the brain off for 4 minutes, but the 'astral body' flies around the hospital - thousands of cases of detail recognition in that state. A feeling of Iamness is said to be there then.

I'm not sure how you got the impression that he says that without a brain you feel I- amness? Without a brain you are clearly dead and don't feel anything....

@mrfatd I have qualms with describing it as "new age". This type of thinking has shown up in writings almost 3000 years back. Hundred of people from all over the world, with completely different backgrounds ranging from Hindu's, to American Physicists, have given similar experiential accounts. They do vary from one to another, and they can't all be all right. But you'd be a brave man to say that all these different accounts over the past 3 millennium have nothing worth looking deeper into.

"I am that I am"