Presuppositional Apologetics (3 of 5)

Blog: http://streetapologetics.com
Yesterday an organized team of atheists came to the Huntington Beach Pier where Ray Comfort, Stuart Scott, and I preach. They showed up at the pier hours before we normally arrive. First thing I saw when I walked up was approximately 20 atheists touting signs that said things like "I'm good without God" "You don't need God" ect.

I asked one of the group leaders (Jose) if he would be willing to have a dialogue in an open-air type of environment so that the crowed could benefit from the exchange of words. He declined and refused to give up the piece of landscape that we normally preach from.
With that, Ray and I ended up communicating to the atheist in one-on-one styled conversations. The atheists were filming with a professional camera-man so somewhere along the way our cameras came out too. It was a very interesting and enjoyable encounter and I hope to see the atheist group come out more in the future.
The man I talk to in this video clip was entertaining to say the least. You see, he denied that the "Law of Non-Contradiction" (L.N.C.) was true. WHAT??? YEP!!! He expresses that contradictions are OK and acceptable in his worldview yet he kept applying that which he denied to our conversation. He would apply the LNC every-time he disagreed, attempted to change my mind, asserted he was correct, claimed I was wrong ect.
So much could be said but I will refrain. Let me just set things up and point out that we start a conversation with a man that lives in a world were contradictions are perfectly acceptable and by the end of the conversation 2 Corinthians 10:5 prevails.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Presuppositional Apologetics
• apologetics
• rationalresponder
• rational responder
• ambassadors' alliance
• Chad Williams
• Ray Comfort
• The way of the master
• thewayofthemaster
• evangelism
• proof that God exists
• atheist
• atheist debate
• christian debate
• greg bahnsen
• street preaching
• open-air
• church
• atheism
• bible
• dawkins
• philosophy

[MaharlikaAWA]

Anyone who says that rationalresponder is being a jerk or rude clearly doesnt understand how stupid this atheists arguments are. Who is getting extremely angry and cussing? not rationalresponder. He was making rational arguments. Giving a commentary is not how a person should argue. He has every right to show confidence and stand up for what he believes. Do you think Jesus just stood around smiling when the Pharisees argued idiotic things? No!

[6gunwalker]

i love how the christian theist is bringing the rain

[SomeBread7]

@SomeBread7 know this took me 2 and a half hours to wright down and to sum up the argument

he is not up set because he "doesnt understand how stupid (his) atheists arguments are"

he is up set because the theists is giving him 10 seconds to say what it took me 2 and a half hours to explain

the world is not so black and wight. in fact there is no grey, no paper, no shape, no reason, and in my opinion no god. (part 5)

thats it good night and god bless

[SomeBread7]

@SomeBread7 because evidence is independent of logic, one can assume that the laws of nature will continue to act in the same way as they acted in the past and still be aware that the laws might change just as the laws change in extreme cases (hadron collider)

as for the cat being alive and dead. idea is that there could be two time lines one where the cat is alive and one where the cat is dead. and until you know witch time line you are in you must assume that the cat is both (part 4)