Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy Pt 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,636
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NovusOrdo2012 This program is trying to acknowledge scientific details only - some people prefer this to endless, redundant speculation. More than likely, Oswald was the only shooter, but people don't like the truth... especially when it's boring.

  • Anything that Gary Mack says should be taken with a grain of salt. That man has absolutely no morals whatsoever. FACT: Officer Craig found bullets in the TSBD that did "not" match. The gun that was found was a "German Mauser", not an Italian Carcano, notoriously known as a piece of junk. The "only" fingerprints found belonged to "Malcolm Wallace", LBJs personal hitman. No paraffin traces were found on Oswald.

  • The US government couldn't even keep the watergate scandal covered up. You think the government did all this and nothing has come up after what, 50 years? GET REAL.

  • Gawd, anybody who denies the extended plot to kill JFK and sieze power for a ruthless cabal fronting the ends of power & wealth for oil, military industrial, war profiteering, Federal Reserve & Banking interests simply doesn't have minimal knowledge of the overwhelming evidence or else is complicit in the disinfo or cover-up. One of the biggest clues is that NONE of the dozens of officials who were accesories after the fact or negligent or blocked justice were indicted or disciplined. Get REAL.

  • davshammer ..it will show the truth....what had happen then...cause if there is a consipiracy then the fault is not of the shooters only but the system of the goverment also which allowed this big conspiracy to hide...it allows ur to prevent from the kind of thing from happening...

  • Indeed. Garrison was fond of asking "Cui bono" ("who benefits" from the conspiracy? At this point, it's obvious that those writing conspiracy books (often with such tantilizing titles that would make the New York Post blush) are the ones benefiting most by sustaining the American people's doubt. I wonder if Authors like Lifton, Groden, Summers, etc. would even pass polygraphs stating they believe their own theories.

  • there is and, was no conspiracy. the author's of the conspiracy theories, earned ten's or hundred's of million's of dollars, on here say, on book sale's. hoover and, johnson did not conspire to murder jfk.. they benefited the most, above all. all the skepticism of the warren report is a insult to one's intelligence.

  • Haha! Agree, Obelisk.

  • I sympathize with your observation, davshammer, that "if they find a conspiracy or not, who cares? they're all dead!" However, it's historically important, because if there WERE a conspiracy, it would point to massive problems with our government, and particularly its various agencies (FBI, CIA, etc.) which would then need to be addressed. While I don't believe in a conspiracy, I appreciate the desire to uncover any wrongdoing by these various agencies in the recent (and still relevant) past.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more