Icons of Evolution :: Evolution in School (Clip 1)

Are students learning the whole truth about Darwin's theory of evolution?
According to a growing number of scientists, the surprising answer is no. They claim that many of the most famous "Icons of Evolution"--including Darwin's "Tree of Life," finches from the Galapagos Islands, and embryos that look remarkably similar--are based on outdated research and sloppy logic. They say students are being hurt by the failure to present both sides of an emerging scientific debate over Darwin's theory.

Come explore this fascinating new conflict over evolution in the classroom--a conflict based on science, not religion. Learn about the controversy that engulfs one town when a teacher actually tries to tell students that some scientists disagree with Darwin.



To purchase this DVD visit:
http://www.coldwatermedia.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Co...


(For HQ Version add "&fmt=18" to the end of the url.)


.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Icons
• Evolution
• Science
• Intelligent
• Expelled
• Movie
• Design
• Human
• Man
• Charles
• Darwin
• Theroy
• Creation
• Natural

[inspectorcrud]

So Roger DeHart is saying that we shouldn't learn parrot fashion, regurgitate facts, and that its good to question previously accepted wisdom.

This means that you shouldn't be afraid to ask tough searching questions of either science or religion, and they shouldn't be afraid to answer them.

[glendaweil]

darwin was right about micro evolution the whole macro evolution is just bs bad science supported by atheistic morons.

[youarethecosmos]

I want to be a bio-dancer

[youarethecosmos]

evolution of my limbs

[TheLaunchingPad]

@Jonstern1983 - Science is the best thing that could ever happen because it makes life easier. I ain't knocking it, just hoping that it would keep an open mind. Science merely proved demons exist and are viral and cause an infestation proving it was not in the mind only. Then they will prove that Jesus could rise from death when they see the 2 witnesses. They are working on stuff that makes them like Gods themselves. They clone & make living cells and still deny that someone beat us to it. Proof

[Jonstern1983]

@permanentrecordsvids Science is the method of discovering how reality works. Religion is a set of beliefs that have always ignored the possibility that they can be disproved. Where is the secular account of Jesus' resurrection? The fact is that the bible is probably as accurate as Spider-man. It is scientifically more probable that a man could get a retrovirus that could give them enhanced abilities, than a man get up, and having no loss of abilities after being dead for 3 days.

[TheLaunchingPad]

I was on my friends computer, reply to this account. sorry bout that.

[Jonstern1983]

@TheLaunchingPad I meant from the time you posted. The simple fact is, science explains things that actually exist. The only things that are known to exist are things that can be proven to exist, therefore science is completely agnostic about gods. As for demons, we know that, unlike what the bible says, demons do not cause disease because we have proven what causes disease. Granted many, indeed most scientists are atheists, but that is simply because gods have not been proven to exist.