Upload

This video is unavailable.

Climate Denial Crock of the Week - The "Urban Heat Island" Crock

greenman3610 greenman3610·115 videos
15,092

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
21,217
Like     Dislike 68

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like greenman3610's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike greenman3610's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add greenman3610's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Mar 14, 2009

Could the scientists at Nasa, the National academy of science, the American Meteorological Society, and every professional scientific organization on the planet really have been so silly as to miss something this obvious?

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (greenman3610)

  • edward eadie

    This is propaganda bullshit

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate edward eadie's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate edward eadie's comment.
  • greenman3610

    elegantly argued and persuasive. bravo!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.
    in reply to edward eadie (Show the comment)

Video Responses

This video is a response to True News: The Case Against Climate Change

All Comments (1,434)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Go Jo

    omg the ussr region is naturally cold that is why the mean increase in a 30 plus year period of construction boom increases the temperature of ussr the most because the heat of the world has to expand and escape somewhere, places that have declined in construction will actually get cooler since the 1950's.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Go Jo's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Go Jo's comment.
    in reply to greenman3610 (Show the comment)
  • cbrhawk1

    There's nothing I disagree with on this. We've almost certainly caused a warming of the climate, but the question is how much? The devil is in the details, and we simply don't have enough information from the past to even determine how much temperature particular forcings cause. If very few agree on the details of the past, we have absolutely no clue about the future.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.
    in reply to KrunchyJD (Show the comment)
  • KrunchyJD

    Humans cannot completely control the direction of the climate, but, we have made the climate warmer, by creating more CO2, by burning fossil fuels. Most of the excess CO2 comes from humans burning things.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate KrunchyJD's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate KrunchyJD's comment.
    in reply to cbrhawk1 (Show the comment)
  • cbrhawk1

    The reason why I say it is probably small is because there are other reasonable correlations with an increased temperature, such as solar output, PDO, ENSO cycles. All of these combined with a slow, gradual temp rise due to the GH effect fit quite well, I believe.

    But, as I said, we don't know, and if humans are causing catastrophic climate change, I want to know, but I won't have anything to do with change until we get some real evidence on the table.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.
    in reply to greenman3610 (Show the comment)
  • greenman3610

    You're sure that it's "unknown" and at the same time "pretty small"?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.
    in reply to cbrhawk1 (Show the comment)
  • cbrhawk1

    That isn't "deniers" that is alarmists that think that we humans can completely control the direction of the climate. Human influence on global climate is unknown and is probably pretty small.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.
    in reply to KrunchyJD (Show the comment)
  • cbrhawk1

    I'm not cherrypicking anything. I use data from both sides of the argument to make my case. I cite sensitivity estimates that say 7C to 9C for a doubling of CO2 because it shows that there is no agreement on the details.

    Yes, all national science academies and scientists agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. I fully agree with this consensus view.

    I never claimed a conspiracy, that's your strawman.I'm an easy person to argue with,you don't have to make up my positions since I make mine clear.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cbrhawk1's comment.
    in reply to greenman3610 (Show the comment)
  • greenman3610

    you are the one cherry picking. we turn to science to give us the best current view - the National Academies of every country, and every professional science group that has examined the issue are in agreement.

    Of course, in the conspiratorial mind, that just means it's all the more sinister. That's why you are not taken seriously.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate greenman3610's comment.
    in reply to cbrhawk1 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later