Could the scientists at Nasa, the National academy of science, the American Meteorological Society, and every professional scientific organization on the planet really have been so silly as to miss something this obvious?
@greenman3610 "ALL of my videos are copiously and transparently cited" ALL? Really? ALL? You sure? hahaha HAHAhaha HAHAHAHHAAHA Except for the ones that AREN'T that is. For the umteenth time, please copiously cite the source of your quote from a FICTIONAL CHARACTER at the beginning of your 'In the 70s' crock. hahahaha HAHAhahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Come on, YOU SAID people would think you're a clueless blowhard if you didn't give sources. Time to walk the talk Mr.Cluelessblowhard3610!
@greenman3610: You really are obtuse. I often wonder if you're even capable of reading the English language, you so utterly fail to understand what is addressed to you. You can pretend (atleast to yourself if no one else) that we've never attempted to converse on any other vidoe then this one. Even you know that isn't true. I've exposed how fatuous your videos are. It has no effect on your propaganda out put. You are the one who acts like a "DENIER." No matter how your arguments are refuted.
@greenman3610: We've all wasted enough or our lives making detailed critiques of YOUR bloviations. Demonstrating your strawman constructs of your opponents & your passing off mere speculations or "models" as real evidence is tiresome. My past experience w/ is enough for me to dismiss your similar efforts.
@andreiuta171: Most leftwing enthusiasms are a substitute for more conventional religions. It gives a sense of meaning & purpose to their lives. & "greenism" is a leftist scam. It is more properly called the watermelon movement. Politicians love "being green" for the same reason they love Keynesian economics. It justifies their controlling others handing privileges out to a few friends.
I'd like to see our boy Greenman explain Soyndra. That is what "green" is about, cronyism.
@VictorLepanto That`s true. And this is how all AGW supporters behave. There is no room for debate with them, and that is not the scientific way. If you say anything against their beliefs you are crazy or stupid and they are right all the time no matter how powerful the evidence against them is. Just like a religion.
@andreiuta171: No doubt you've discerned Greenman's standard MO? He 1st attitudinizes on his opponents in a smug condescending manner, even when dealing scientists obviously far more knowledgable then him. 2nd he presents a fatuous simplistic interpretation of his oppenents position 3rd he presents mere models & conjectures put out by others as though they constituted real data based evidence. The notion that someones model of what might be happening ISN'T what IS happening is alien to him
@greenman3610 you haven`t crushed anything. those huge temperature swings are real (Richard Alley says) and it`s the same as the antarctica records so it`s global. Those swings cannot be anthropogenic and they are very cyclical. I`ve watched your link but i have to ask you: what did you utterly crushed? just because Alley says that co2 is to blame i have to believe it? there are thousands of people that say the same thing. thank god his data cannot be bought and can`t tell lies.
RealOldOne2 1 week ago
@greenman3610: You really are obtuse. I often wonder if you're even capable of reading the English language, you so utterly fail to understand what is addressed to you. You can pretend (atleast to yourself if no one else) that we've never attempted to converse on any other vidoe then this one. Even you know that isn't true. I've exposed how fatuous your videos are. It has no effect on your propaganda out put. You are the one who acts like a "DENIER." No matter how your arguments are refuted.
VictorLepanto 1 month ago
@VictorLepanto
a lot of words to say "I got nuthin'"
greenman3610 1 month ago
@greenman3610: We've all wasted enough or our lives making detailed critiques of YOUR bloviations. Demonstrating your strawman constructs of your opponents & your passing off mere speculations or "models" as real evidence is tiresome. My past experience w/ is enough for me to dismiss your similar efforts.
VictorLepanto 1 month ago
@andreiuta171: Most leftwing enthusiasms are a substitute for more conventional religions. It gives a sense of meaning & purpose to their lives. & "greenism" is a leftist scam. It is more properly called the watermelon movement. Politicians love "being green" for the same reason they love Keynesian economics. It justifies their controlling others handing privileges out to a few friends.
I'd like to see our boy Greenman explain Soyndra. That is what "green" is about, cronyism.
VictorLepanto 1 month ago
@andreiuta171
All of my videos are copiously and transparently cited.
maybe one of these days you'll cite something tangible, attempt to rebut something, and actually begin a discussion, instead of merely bloviating.
Let me know when you're ready.
greenman3610 1 month ago
@VictorLepanto That`s true. And this is how all AGW supporters behave. There is no room for debate with them, and that is not the scientific way. If you say anything against their beliefs you are crazy or stupid and they are right all the time no matter how powerful the evidence against them is. Just like a religion.
andreiuta171 1 month ago
@andreiuta171: No doubt you've discerned Greenman's standard MO? He 1st attitudinizes on his opponents in a smug condescending manner, even when dealing scientists obviously far more knowledgable then him. 2nd he presents a fatuous simplistic interpretation of his oppenents position 3rd he presents mere models & conjectures put out by others as though they constituted real data based evidence. The notion that someones model of what might be happening ISN'T what IS happening is alien to him
VictorLepanto 1 month ago
@andreiuta171
Anyone who wishes to can watch my vid, read what Alley says, and decide for themselves who is telling the truth.
greenman3610 1 month ago
@greenman3610 you haven`t crushed anything. those huge temperature swings are real (Richard Alley says) and it`s the same as the antarctica records so it`s global. Those swings cannot be anthropogenic and they are very cyclical. I`ve watched your link but i have to ask you: what did you utterly crushed? just because Alley says that co2 is to blame i have to believe it? there are thousands of people that say the same thing. thank god his data cannot be bought and can`t tell lies.
andreiuta171 1 month ago