BWV 538 - Toccata und Fuge in d-moll - Karl Richter 1/2
Uploader Comments (advisorC101)
Top Comments
-
@MusicPredominates, Stop pulling strawmen out of your hat and think about why I said what I did instead. Richter made a point himself that his playing could never be "perfect" as he needed to create something new each time, that was the 'secret' to his success.I am merely repeating his own thoughts and making observations from an objective standpoin. I never once claimed to be "on par" with him. I also find it rather comical that you claim I am young when you've never even met me.
Video Responses
All Comments (78)
-
@Puppyjump Never mind...I found it by navigating thru the MP3 store link
-
I'd like to buy the entire CD that this recording came from. Anybody know exactly which release this came from?
-
What a mighty performance!!!
-
Oh my. I think I've found one of my new favorite pieces...
-
Fantastic, this is really fantastic!
-
unbelieveble
-
Music for Heaven!
-
@advisorC101 : 'Good on yah' advisorC101.



I don't understand why people can't just write: "Beautiful" and get on with their day. Instead they start arguing...
hbmp88 5 months ago 2
@hbmp88, Because the matter of beauty is a highly subjective one. It's perfectly natural for controversy to follow in light of that, and it gets even more intsense when we comment from a visceral reaction and not actual knowledge. I think it's good that there's a lot of debate, and my channel especially is simply drenched in it. Arguing is simply another way of learning.
If you really find it that unpleasant, then simply turn a blind eye to it. Like most of the people who only want to listen.
advisorC101 5 months ago
This has a certain compelling authenticity to it, I mean a personal authenticity not a period authenticity, which makes it musically on a par with the M. Schneider posting of this piece. I wonder if the "touch" of this organ is what's dictating the tempo, in addition to the acoustic. And what idiot would write that acoustic should not dictate tempo.
Blockedify 6 months ago
@Blockedify, one that puts the structure and character of the piece above all else. One that is also not bound by such a frail sense of perception. Don't misunderstand, I do believe that we should always take the acoustic into consideration and treat it seriously. But if this will undermine the quality of what the composer originally produced, then it's simply not worth fretting over. There's also the subjectivity involved with how tempi work in certain acoustic that is a basis for disagreement.
advisorC101 6 months ago