英皇攪笑教學(賭錢篇)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
50,687
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 20, 2007

雖然...佢講完我都唔係好知佢講緊乜...但幾得意架^^

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • 真係俾佢吹漲, 點解我以前跟佢上Econ會無呢d動畫呢?

    (不過精讀班有漫畫送, 而且仲整到本YES咁)

  • again, he's so wrong. Each round of the bet is not independent as the winning probability changes according to the cards turned over. The $10 million should be included in opportunity cost valuation because that's the opportunity cost to win the hand and the game. Bad example. Plus, the marginal of utility plays a more important role in this case. That is the marginal utility of $1 million compared to $10 million. Senior teacher, full of shit.

see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @jimfee42 maybe he considers it as sunk cost because he mentioned the probably of winning is very low (or zero).

  • 呢D片 呢D故事

    雖然講唔出D咩大道理

    但係我睇完之後覺得非常之有親切咁

    所以我高度推介呢條片比讀econ既朋友收睇

  • 唔好咁挑剔啦

  • 但對方有可能係玩虛張聲勢心理戰搏你唔跟,其實佢無葵線5

  • judo chops!!!

  • @kelvinpoon123 你唔係認為你會勁過佢啊?

  • 佢冇講錯喎

    佢唔係講呢場賭局輸贏既可能性

    而係解釋選擇跟或唔跟既oppotunity cost係幾多

    佢由頭到尾冇建議過應該係跟定唔跟

    我唔明下面果d reply點解話佢錯

  • @kelvinpoon123 你仲唔明  你自己睇多次人地00:40講咩 條友掉左1000萬出去囉

  • @ahmale 我係講緊佢話後面輸少當嬴果到.唔係講緊機會成本

  • @kelvinpoon123 留心D啦00:40你係咪無開喇叭???

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more