Re: Terry Hobbs Speaks Part 1
Uploader Comments (Farmboy7899)
Top Comments
-
Thanks for bringing to us, Farmboy. I love all of your videos and pretty much agree with most of them. However, no matter what, I support your support for the WM3! :)
Video Responses
All Comments (39)
-
@keemosobbee They were not 100 sure it was Hobbs hair at all if they were they would have looked at him way more.
The MF3 boy's were knowen to hang at that area all the time where the 3 little boy's were attacked.
Plus the boy's were panicing afterwards, when the three little boy's were discovered.
Then police went after the MF3 right away because those boy's were the bad eggs of the area and immidiate suspects.
Then when quaetioned one boy told exactly what he saw them do.
Guilty
-
Yeah whatever. For 15 years people chased after John Mark Byers for this, figuratively of course, and now they want Terry Hobbs. Anyone did it except the WM3 right? Bunch of sheep.
-
The killers were convicted years ago. Simple as that.
-
@Farmboy7899 thanks
-
@Linester25 terry hobbs said he didnt see the kids all day, his neighbours have came out and said they saw terry yelling at the boys the day of there murder, if ur step kid died u think you wouldnt remember the last time u saw them?
-
First, I do agree 100%. We really should learn from past mistakes. The WM3 "looked" guilty back in the day but they were not. Now Terry Hobbs "looks" guilty but does that mean he is?
-
hOBBS IS A CHILD MOLESTER - HE MOLESTED HIS OWN DAUGHTER AND IS A CONVICED FELON AND HIS STEP SON ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION BEFORE HE WAS MURDERED BY HIM AND HIS CHILD MOLESTIN FRIEND
-
Bless you Farmboy !
why wasn't the three boys mothers hairs found In any ligature. or each others hairs found in the ligature or the other kids who they played withs hairs in the ligature. why just terry hobbs' hair?
keemosobbee 3 months ago
@keemosobbee and his friend David Jacoby's hair on a nearby tree. Great question.
Farmboy7899 3 months ago
I'm definitely not defending Hobbs....but it SEEMS these memories might have been more fresh in 1993...not in 2007...14 years after the freaking fact...
Linester25 1 year ago
@Linester25 Maybe, but whether he is guilty or not, I would think as a stepfather who lost a son, he'd never forget that day or anything about it.
Farmboy7899 1 year ago
@Farmboy7899 You could be right....I guess it depends..I lost my brother 2 years ago and i honestly couldn't tell you what happened for several weeks after the loss...
The only point i'm trying to make here is when a child is murdered, and a father is pretty much a known abuser...it's standard to interview them about the crime......IMMEDIATELY..not 14 years after the fact..They had tunnel vision the entire time, and 3 people were convicted with no evidence.
Linester25 1 year ago 4
@Linester25 I can agree with that.
Farmboy7899 9 months ago