Spyderco Massad Ayoob

Spyderco Massad Ayoob C60S
Blade Length: 3 5/8″
Closed Length: 4 13/16″
Overall Length: 8 7/16″
Weight: 4.3oz
Blade Material: VG-10
Blade Finish: Satin Finish
Blade Grind: Hollow Grind
Handle Material: Almite Coated Aluminum
Locking Mechanism: Lock Back
Years Produced: 2001-2002
Manufacture Location: Seki-City Japan

Category:

Education

Tags:

• spyderco
• massad
• ayoob
• guns
• firearms
• folder
• pocket
• knife
• knives
• tactical
• self-defense
• weapon
• fighting
• law
• enforcement
• military
• review
• discontinued
• limited
• sprint
• run

[dylbyl1234]

lol it looks like a steak knife

[niimo]

@dylbyl1234 It's a man-steak knife.

[LONEWOLF3404]

nice knife!in summer...with cold hand,you can't deploy this knife so fast...(theoric self defence scenario) great cutting power!with g10 handle 5 star knife...i actually carry garra 2,lighter,faster,istinctive use and no more expansive...steel blade,not so important in self defence...sorry for my english!

[niimo]

@LONEWOLF3404 Thank you for your comment. :) Ah yes, I have taken a real liking to the hawkbill and wharncliff blade shapes. The Garra 2 looks quite effective, and affordable. Yes, if only the Ayoob had g-10! Ah well..

[Ghostisbulletproof]

gunfire

[MadtactiX]

It'd be sweet to have that knife with "carraca" like the Navaja. Nice vid and review man.

[billymayer1000]

@dylbyl1234 maybe not so much, with he curvature, it would be hard to use the length of the blade to cut because the end of the handle would be hitting the table O.o

[ranhat2]

Being made again, I found. $149. I've had one for years, then they disappeared. They need only one thing: Nonslip surface.

See Knife Center.

[StephenFTD]

Gun fire in background

[bcjaliu]

LOL...what the hell does Ayoob know about knife fighting; the only thing that Ayoob ever knife fought is probably a steak!

[nuttybollockz]

@Monger4142

this is specifically designed for cqc... it's much in the same way if karambit met katana had a baby, then that baby grew up and had a baby with a steak knife...

it'll cut you ugly to ribbons...

[tengc]

If you feel you will not get a fair trial due to a biased judge, you can ask him to inhibit. I know of 1 person who tried to piss off a judge and the judge inhibited himself for that trial and all the cases that particular lawyer would handle! hahaha I do find it disturbing when you said the exercise of your rights may get you a stiffer penalty. It's precisely the complete knowledge and exercise of your rights that may get you off the hook. Judges will be constrained to allow you 2 exercise them

[faffaflunkie]

@tengc My point here is that if you are ever unfortunate enough to be charged with a crime don't believe that you will automatically get a fair trial. If you defend yourself with any implement (in CA even fists are "Deadly Weapons") and get charged with a felony the last thing you want to see is your (inexperienced) lawyer get his butt kicked around the courtroom by the DA. You'll waste years in prison and your attorney will blame his asshole (all clients are assholes) of a client.

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie What I'm merely trying to say is the defendant should be notified of the charge/s against him. That's it. I don't really want to discuss remedial law on you tube. hehehe I have enough of that s#it daily... :)

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie Yes, it is not a lesser offense. There are different kinds of robberies like force upon things, violence or intimidation, etc. If the robbers did hold some hostages against their will for more than a few hours it may be considered kidnapping. Also, the title of the complaint does not determine the charge, it's the body of the complaint that does that. If the complaint is for "Robbery" only but the facts in the body also include kidnapping, kidnapping will be included.

[Monger4142]

you can see why its discontinued.

ugly shit

[faffaflunkie]

@tengc Usually the amendment is to add a kidnapping charge to a complaint alleging only robbery. They say the case was amended on "the 59th day" (the next to last day for trial in CA). Now robbery is definitely NOT a lesser included charge of kidnapping. Sometimes the amendment is made during trial and occasionally just before the jury is instructed. There is a reason prisons are full of poor people. Realize that when you exercise your rights it angers the judge and the charges can go up.

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie Evidence presented at the preliminary investigation may be considered notice if the elements of new crime charged under the amendment are necessarily included in the crime originally charged because it will not affect the defenses available to the accused. Though judicial discretion is deeply rooted in jurisprudence it still may not be used to charge a different crime altogether. Ex: a person charged with theft may not be suddenly charged with homicide right before a jury is charg

[faffaflunkie]

@tengc You have to tell me which jurisdiction you are referring to. In the U.S. complaints are amended all the way until the jury is charged. Of course this has to be done with leave of court. Remember most judges were prosecutors. The D.A. will say that evidence presented at the preliminary stage constituted "notice". This practice very well may be unconstitutional but the appellate courts allow it under the "judicial discretion" doctrine. That is why anyone charged needs the very best lawyer.

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie I think you forgot the important part of amending the complaint with leave of court in order for the accused to change his defenses if ever the complaint is amended after arraignment. You CANNOT AMEND A PLEADING ANYTIME. Specially changing the charge before giving it to the jury. That would be preposterous!

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie Very wrong. Complaints can only be amended prior to the filing of the other party's responsive pleading. You CANNOT just amend the complaint anytime. That would be against the very fundamental law that the person be informed of the charge/s against him. That law is violated anytime the complaint is changed in any way that will alter the available defenses of the accused. You're right, one should get the best lawyer.

[faffaflunkie]

@tengc Wrong again. Complaints can be amended at any time including just prior to giving the case to the jury for deliberation. Prosecutors do not "waive" any right to charge a person with offenses not in the complaint even after an indictment. For example often a complaint is amended during trial to charge a person with kidnapping who was charged in the information only with robbery. This only shows the importance of getting the best lawyer you can afford if you are ever charged with a crime.

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie I said "depends on how it's used." A car CAN be a weapon. If the accused tries to run over a cop, it WILL be considered a deadly weapon. To do so the allegation must 1st be alleged in the complaint because under the Omnibus Motion Rule, allegations not averred in the complaint are deemed waived. Then the issues will be set for preliminary investigation to determine if a warrant of arrest will be issued based on probable cause personally determined by a judge. Then pre-trial...etc.

[faffaflunkie]

@tengc No. A car is not normally a weapon. Of course if a cop shoots an unarmed driver or passenger he will always say the driver was trying to run him over and he (the officer) was defending himself. There was once a case where an officer was dragged and then shot at from a moving car and the judge instructed the jury that they could ascertain EITHER the vehicle or the gun as the deadly weapon but that (the lack of a "pinpoint" instruction) is a highly technical aspect of the law.

[tengc]

@faffaflunkie Being considered a weapon depends on how it's used. If a person tries to run over a cop with a car, the car will be considered a deadly weapon thus aggravating a charge.