General: The Manifesto of the Communist Party, usually referred to as The Communist Manifesto, was first published on February 21, 1848, and is one of the world's most influential political tracts. Commissioned by the Communist League and written by communist theorists Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, it laid out the League's purposes and program. The Manifesto suggested a course of action for a proletarian (working class) revolution to overthrow the ruling class of bourgeoisie and to eventually bring about a classless society.
Autorship: Although the names of both Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx appear on the title page alongside the "persistent assumption of joint-authorship", Engels, in the preface introduction to the 1883 German edition of the Manifesto, said that the Manifesto was "essentially Marx's work" and that "the basic thought... belongs solely and exclusively to Marx."[1] McLellan, along with many other scholars, believes that "the actual drafting of The Communist Manifesto was done exclusively by Marx.
It is claimed in the text itself to have been sketched by a group of Communists from various countries that gathered together in London.
Textual History: The Communist Manifesto's initial publication, in 1848, was in German. The first English translation was produced by Helen MacFarlane in 1850. The Manifesto went through a number of editions from 1872 to 1890; notable new prefaces were written by Marx and Engels for the 1872 German edition, the 1882 Russian edition, the 1883 German edition, and the 1888 English edition. This edition, translated by Samuel Moore with the assistance of Engels, has been the most commonly used English text since.
However, some recent English editions, such as Phil Gasper's annotated "road map" (Haymarket Books, 2006), have used a slightly modified text in response to criticisms of the Moore translation made by Hal Draper in his 1994 history of the Manifesto, The Adventures of the "Communist Manifesto" (Center for Socialist History, 1994).
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
WHat a great little piece...even though I was horrified by Communist China and the USSR in the 80s (and I visited the GDR), I still remember reading the Communist Manifesto when I was in High School and thinking it held some basic truths. With globalization this is more true than ever. But Communist parties themselves have never really been able to "capitalize" on this classic story from Marx and Engels. Who knows what the future holds...
I am self-oriented, and that does not mean i do things for myself and only myself. The people i love and my dog are of great value to me. I would take a bullet for them because they are everything to me. By what you say, i really think you would be interested in Ayn Rand's philosophy. If you could really give it an honest glance, I greatly believe you would find it very liberating and wonderful.
Coercion implies force. cooperation implies volition. A complete contradiction. To coerce them to build the bridge is slavery. If they do it voluntarily it is cooperation. They cooperate because it is in their self interest, just like a voluntary army. A draft would be coercion. People will fight when it is right.
Secondly a lot of resources r renewable. and when one resources run out, they can adapt and, with the creativity that capitalism allows, find different uses for different resources.
I hate to say it but when the people around you find out you are so self-orientated, you're gonna end up with very few friends to call on when you need help.
Ten people live on the side of a large, fast river. After a few years they consume all the natural resources on their side while the other side has an abundance of resources. One man stands up and says "Hey, let's all work together to build a bridge to the other side." You could easily say this man is using coercion to get the bridge built. You could also say he's doing it for selfish means but the fact is the whole group benefits. Coercion is not always a bad thing. Coercion = cooperation.
I wouldn't do that! I don't think man can only offer material. We r rational beings & can, unlike other animals, plan long term & chose however we wish 2 live our lives. Other animals r programed in an almost stereotypical way, 2 do only wat they're taught for their survival. We, as humans, have a much larger capacity than that. I advocate capitalism, which allows man to interact free from coercion, so that i'm able to make the best of my life, via effort and right to keep fruits of that effort.
I'm sorry, but i could ask the same of you. wat difference would it make. I am not saying that man should seek riches for the sake of riches. If he is doin somethin he truly values, such as all world changing icons did, he is still working in his self-interest. Man's work is his glory. He can claim that this is his own mind at work, that his brilliance can accomplish anything he sets his mind to. He is man, the animal of reason and free will.
If you really believe what you say then test it out. Get rid of all your stuff and go live in the woods completely alone. You seem to think that the only contribution is material. What about the vast amount of information we've gathered over thousands of years? You can not put a value on that. Without all that information you would die, plain and simple. We do need each other, even if it's only the information passed down to us by our ancestors.
If you don't mind me asking, what do you do exactly? Can you compare it to the work of Albert Einstein? Nikola Tesla? I'm pretty sure that whatever you do will never equal the value of the work of these men and others like them. They didn't do what they did for money, they both died poor. Sure, they could have done it for themselves, but I'd like to think they wanted to further mankind as a whole, which they did quite well.
That is exactly the benefit we have for living in a society. I agree with u, but we do not need each other to survive; reason is our only mode of survivial.
I agree with you that we all BENEFIT, not depend, on the effort of others, but MY point is that they do their effort for their own self-interest. Inventors invent to make money, or cuz they truly love wat they do, as they should. And when they pursue their rational self-interest, I also benefit. They then TRADE with me, value for value.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Secondly a lot of resources r renewable. and when one resources run out, they can adapt and, with the creativity that capitalism allows, find different uses for different resources.
I agree with you that we all BENEFIT, not depend, on the effort of others, but MY point is that they do their effort for their own self-interest. Inventors invent to make money, or cuz they truly love wat they do, as they should. And when they pursue their rational self-interest, I also benefit. They then TRADE with me, value for value.