KEN HAM IS AN IDIOT part 1A of 3 (or 4)
Uploader Comments (dechha1981)
Top Comments
-
"if evolution was true then we would have nothing to live for "
You REALLY need a girlfreind or a family or a life or a Ps3 or something.
"so we can do what ever we want to and no one should need to stop us"
So, to you, there's no reason not to do bad things without threats of hellfire. That makes you a sociopath.
Frankly, that was just terrible.
-
Congratulations. You're officially the dumbest person to comment on this video.
All Comments (170)
-
I feel like you could have some good points, but I can't even watch this video because it's so distasteful.
-
@Gruenders Um, the bible speaks approvingly of *genocide*! Or had you forgotten that?
-
I'm a hardcore Christian, and even I think he's a little mentally crazy. He's probably a nice guy, but he sure is clueless
-
Ken Ham is living proof of evolution. Physical evolution at least. Mentally, he still hasn't come down from the trees.
-
On behalf of all australians i say to you > hes in american and you can keep him
-
@Gruenders cretinard wanker, boy you lot are so knuckle scrapingly dumb.
-
@dechha1981 Speaking of Lincoln , Mary Todd Lincolns family were the largest producers of marijuana in Kentucky. An odd harvest to be sure for presidential involvement.
No matter how strange people were, will never change the truth. That is the only part that matters. The truth, it may take us many tries to get there but try we must. Is The alternative to just to sit back and pray? That should go well, Ever heard of the black plague? prepare for round 2.
-
The curse of Ham does NOT refer to black people!
oh really
why is it then that the old name for the inhabitants of africa was 'hametic races'
[read any book covering anthropology up to about 1950 and you will see this was the case]
-
"Josephus (37-100 a.d.) wrote about Him."
Josephus was not a contemporary. Worse, his statements are very likely fabrications, since they don't match the rest of his writings at all.
Darwin, "Their mental characteristics are likewise very distinct; chiefly as it would appear in their emotional, but partly in their intellectual faculties." Racist, period.
Gruenders 1 year ago
@Gruenders He was an abolitionist at a time when most CHRISTIANS seriously debated whether or not black people counted as humans, fuckwit.
dechha1981 1 year ago