Evolution vs Creation : # 5 Big Bang Theory

BIG BANG THEORY

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• Darwin
• God
• Bible
• intelligent
• design
• transitional
• form
• Big
• Bang
• theory
• natural
• selection
• atheist
• chimp

[aqouby]

Most creationist videos block being able to like or dislike them... Atheism for the win.

[fiesta181]

One example of one explosion producing order: stars producing the chemical elements.

[madmiguelh2o]

Can a rolex watch be formed from a bomb exploding? No therefore an all powerful being created earth in 3 days then day and night, then plants, then the sun, then the rest of the some odd billions of galaxies in the universe in a day.

I don't see why we can't teach our kids this in school.

[madmiguelh2o]

Evolutionists don't talk about the big bang because it has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is simply the observation of life changing over time which is proven by the facts that you people choose to pretend do not exist.

[princess17257]

@GregJoshuaW I agree:D

[kyekire]

You need to 1. Stop making scarecrow arguments. 2. Wake up! Creationism is certainly not a theory, it doesn't qualify as a hypotheses, in fact it isn't even a coherent idea.

[thedutchman01]

at 0:50. Nobody is saying the universe came into being by an explosion dumb bitch. Only creatards like you claim that scientists claim that.

The big bang was not an explosion. It was a rapid expansion of time and space.

But seeing as that's a rather lenghty description for a headline in a paper. Someone started calling it big bang, and the name stuck.

[aakesson1]

"So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator."

Hmm I wonder why they excluded the next sentence?

"But if the universe is really completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?"

Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time

[GregJoshuaW]

I think it's funny that people refuse to consider that the energy that begot the Big Bang and God aren't the same thing. I mean - God is infinite, omnipresent, etc - right?

Science is not the act of disproving God's existence, it's just trying to explain how things work.

Oh... and it is ridiculous comparing a nuclear explosion to the creation of a watch - c'mon.

[thegreatdefender1]

why do creationists keep confusing the theory of evolution with abiogenesis. The theory of evolution has no dealing whatsoever with the beginning of life, but how forms of life evolve into other forms. Abiogenesis is the event which forms life from non-organic matter.

[him80us]

so let me get this str8...1st the sun was spinning around the earth...now its the opposite...

1st there wasnt any lightning , it was the fury of god...now that is explained...its just lightning

so in the WHOLE known history...where science couldnt explain...IT WAS GOD...

1st the ATOM was only a theory...now we can even divide an ATOM

maybe evolution is not right but...if this is god's BEST JOB...im not impressed

i cant belive in something who MESSED UP almost EVERYTHING

[Equality72521sr]

@DJJulieO

Please re-read what you just said... THEN, get back to us!