Us Open 2005.R.Federer vs A.Agassi.Highlights

Title says it all.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• agassi
• federer
• roger
• andre
• us
• open
• 2005
• best
• highlights
• tennis
• atp
• ever
• match
• godlike

[pyccanful]

when fed didnt give a shit about polo shirts or rolex watches

when he use to hammer the ball

when he use to win

[computermaster]

10+ years makes quite a lot of difference in terms of speed and movement, and not to mention Aggasi's reputation- but with due respect even if he did take performance enhancing drugs I think he'd still lose to Federer!

[pyccanful]

@cro91Maderfaker lol ok kiddo

[cro91Maderfaker]

@pyccanful lol calm down kiddo 

[youziness]

Agassi was completely gassed in 3rd and 4th after using his energy in 2nd set. Fast foward to 2010, 2011, 2012 Federer has same fate in slams, being gassed against younger guys like djokovic and nadal.

[wesmartin91]

@ExtremeMastersVEVO Agassi was awesome. You should also watch his matches against Andy Roddick in 2004, James Blake in 2005, and Marcos Baghdatis in 2006. Even though he is like 10 years older than all of them, he still beats them in very tight matches.

[supers789]

Unbelievable play from Agassi at at the 36.

[LegendKiller0084]

@addy72222 You also have to account for the age factor as well. When Nadal did "figure" out the grass and hardcourt game, Roger was on the slight downhill, no? Roger has a 3-2 edge on hardcourts and a 2-1 edge on grass despite this fact, I think Roger in his prime owned hardcourts and grass while Nadal will still be the King of Clay, but never be one of the top 5 players of all time on the other surfaces....

[addy72222]

@LegendKiller0084 I agree, the Fed-Nadal rivalry stats are just numbers, with a vast majority of their matches having being played on clay. The only reason they've played so much on clay is because Federer was the second-best clay courter out there, and reached clay-tournament finals where he lost to Nadal. Had Federer not been that good on clay, the numbers would tell a different story.

[LegendKiller0084]

@LegendKiller0084 1999-2001*

[LegendKiller0084]

@addy72222 Pete had Andre's number for a glaring reason, the great serve v. the great return. The returner has to react to what the server lays down. If Pete served a perfect 130 mph bomb down the middle, I highly doubt anyone on the planet is touching it, and Pete's underrated baseline ability allowed him to break the suspect Agassi serve. Roger's backhand is vulnerable on clay for its high bounce, and Mr. Nadal is the king of topspin and defense, therefore, on todays slow courts, he beat Roger