Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Base Race: An Introduction to Moon Colonization, 2004-2030

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,278
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 16, 2009

An introduction to a lot of the exciting new goings-on in moon colonization :)

For regular updates on what's happening (and there's a lot), check out my site:
Luna C/I: Moon Colonization and Integration
http://luna-ci.com
What's happening on the moon in the next 20 years, and why :)

Movie made with Google's Picasa 3 (which is free, and awesome).

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Excellent video. I truly hope that nations cooperate and build an international moon base.

  • No laughing matter, it's actually real. There are far more plentiful resources that are more ethical, powerful, safe on the moon than fuels found here on earth. However true we still haven't mapped the entire ocean floor but geologist and scientist have have strong understanding of fuels found on ocean floors. Why you do think there they are spending trillions upon trillions of dollars on space exploration? To make money, you must invest money first. Don't be naive.

see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Its goan get heated hoter then the cold war.

  • Usa will be the first to go to the moon.

  • @samysasy419

    No, that was for the same amount of energy, the same 15 Tw the US uses, the same 15 Tw that would be satisfied by 25 tons of He3 a year.

    Nuclear power is useful in cases where you need a compact but powerful energy source. This is why military ships often use nuclear power. Fusion reactors, if they can be as compact as fission reactors, would be excellent for this sort of thing. No nuclear waste, nothing to build a dirty bomb out of.

    And yeah, spaceships too.

  • Yes, He3 will be a future resource for us and the rest of the world. But haven't you people considered Hydrogen fuel cell as a resource for our cars? This can be used even on the moon if people figure out how to re-use the waste thats been used to make the electricity to power the car. So we can mine not only He3 but O, H, and other gases.

  • @SailorBarsoom He3 may require more processing than solar energy, but He3 produces more enrgy, and and handelled right, it has little to no pollution when being converted to fusion energy. And you didn't address the issue, of He3 becoming an alternative fuel source for our space crafts, which I have posted in a couple of posts now. Solar energy simply can't produce as much energy as fossil fuel does, at least not in a conventional time frame.

  • @samysasy419

    OK, you made me google. I did google, and I ran some numbers. Here's what I came up with:

    Meeting all US energy needs, including fossil fuel replacement, requires 25 tons of He3 every year. This requires processing over 833 million tons of Lunar regolith every year.

    To meet the same needs with powersats requires processing less than 22 million tons of Lunar regolith every year.

    I can post my numbers, but it'll take several posts (it's more than 500 characters).

  • @SailorBarsoom "Solar: exists now" Dude you just proved my point. Solar energy exists now, yet it has little to no effect on our economy, it costs more than it produces, which is why we are still dependent on oil, and which is why it will never replace oil. 25 tons of He3 can power the U.S. for an entire year, wanna guess how many solar panels it would take to power the U.S for an entire year? It would take 100s of sq. miles of it! And it won't even power our spacecrafts/stations.

  • @samysasy419

    Solar: exists now

    Fusion: might exist in 20 years

    But fusion can replace oil faster than solar? Uh-uh. It can't even start to try in less than 20 years, and that's if everything goes right.

    Fusion would be very useful, and I'd love to see it happen. And someday, I'm sure it will. But I reject the idea that we can't do anything until then.

  • @SailorBarsoom Glad you brought that up, fusion can also be used to power ships, not just cities, unlike solar sails. Fusion is the energy of the future, it can be used to even power interstellar spacecrefts if we can harness its full potential. Solar energy won't be able to replace oil in a short time frame, instead, it would drag on for at least 50 years, before becoming at all economical. Plus it can't provide an alternative fuel to chemical rockets, unlike fusion.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more