Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

THE PRISONER. Banned Episode.

"LIVING IN HARMONY" unaired during the series first run on American tv. The climate of that time is shown here thru graphic newsreel footage.  
 
Customize

More From: Pmg6portmeirion

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
32 ratings
Sign in to rate
20,497 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (50)   Options

Loading...
thedogduncan (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
SKULL AND BONES....
RedPillProject (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
we are ALL prisoners of the New World Order = ROTHCHILD FAMILY and company

check out the film ROTHCHILD'S CHOICE
MrCrispian (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
fuck... that guy just shot someone on youtube
MrCrispian (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the network runs america
CornellColumbian (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Xervosh23, I agree with you that Truman dropped the ball on this one. The U.S. financed France's rediculous Indochinal war, in which France more officers each year than they graduated from the Ecole Polytechnique. The real question becomes, at what point was America committed so deeply that it could not find a way out. In my opinion, the final straw that broke the camel's back was JFK's complicity (or perhaps direct involvement) in the murder of Diem and subsequent support of General Mihn.
CornellColumbian (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Living in Harmony" reminded me of Ionesco's "Rhinoceros." In both cases, people were used to deep stories which seemed inscrutable but, if analyzed, yielded a wealth of richness. But "Living in Harmony" and "Rhinoceros" were both shallow and trite.
CornellColumbian (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Vietnam was not a single entity, it was three sovereign states which the French had squashed into one colony. Diem and later Thieu may have wanted to rule Tonkin but never claimed sovereignty thereover. Not even Bao Dai claimed sovereignty over the North following the 1954 Accords, however much he may have wanted to.
BobMonkfish (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That's pretty bad, although there are some cute jokes in it, which redeem it a bit.
Xervosh23 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Truman wanted Vietnam to re-submit to French colonial rule. That was a very foolish miscalculation on his part, one which led perhaps almost inevitably to our involvement in the Vietnam War, and from there, almost inevitably to our side's defeat, due to the easily predicted nationalist reaction to the presence of foreign ("imperialist") troops on what was perceived as sacred Vietnamese soil. Truman seriously dropped the ball on that one.
Xervosh23 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The Vietnamese were/are a very nationalistic people. It was probably always going to be true that whichever side accepted foreign troops on its soil, was going to be the losing side. Thus the USSR was smarter than the USA. Additionally, Ho Ch Minh was a nationalist first, and a Bolshevist second. He wanted to ally with the USA, but Truman rebuffed him, so he went with the USSR by necessity.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.