zimmifryl (abridged)
Loading...
55,008
Uploader Comments (sduck409)
Top Comments
-
@WooblyBoobly Of course you could do all this in software. To do exactly what I'm doing here when I filmed this 2 years ago would have involved some sequencing software that hadn't been written yet, although it could have been emulated easily enough using max. But that's not really the point - while I know and use software synths, and have since the early 90's, I've used modular synths since the mid-70's, and feel comfortable using them. They can do stuff software can't do, and vice versa.
-
i think i found the hipsters
see all
All Comments (122)
-
"Welcome to the amusement park"
-
Two words, "wire management".
-
AH! BUT, can it core a apple?
-
that would be a bitch to learn eh?
-
uuum O_O how do you work that thing?!
-
ohgod.. this is a minimalists nightmare
Loading...
I was just joking around, I think it is cool.
Bleepmap 4 hours ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Bleepmap Don't worry, I was just kidding back at you. Thanks for watching and commenting!
sduck409 3 hours ago in playlist Uploaded videos
My machine is:
200* easier to use
10*smaller
Have almost infinite functions
Can make whole songs, and not just rebirth loops.
5*Cheaper expenses.
NAME: COMPUTER.
Bleepmap 11 hours ago
@Bleepmap o rly? srsly? You mean you can do all that? I thought the computers could only do email and The Google and play solitaire. Why didn't you tell me this a long time ago? ;) (srsly, thx for the comment!)
sduck409 6 hours ago in playlist Uploaded videos 4
If you had to lose all of your modules exept for 4 of them, which ones would you pick?
keoni29 4 days ago
@keoni29 Hmmmm... I'll have to think about that.
sduck409 4 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos