Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Linguistics is something creationists fail at as well

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
338 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2010

I could not find music that I thought fit this and besides it is less then a minute long.

And also the word cognate in linguistics for those who do not know means roots or words that are from the same source they differ from loans that are borrowed from a source be it related or not.

How ever despite showing very little facts it is meant to just very simply show that creationists are as wrong about linguistic diversity as they are with biological diversity . Must be a horror the fact that languages change and evolve and branch out naturally trough dialectal variance change
split of and eventually become less and less understandable from tongue a to tongue b
even if they may later on even influence each other.

Here I use a very simple example from the Indo-European language family .

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Eopyk)

  • Dont be IGNORANT, compare ALL languages of the whole world and not just "indo-europian" bible say that G-d confused all human-childs and spread them all over the world, so your saying only europeans are humans ? Look you dont even know the true bible story because you have no bible knowledge. I speak 3 languages which are also part in europe, but still their totaly different, the similarities came later cuz of goods exchange.

  • @MultiPropagandaPanda and the bible story is bronze age myth.

    No what languages do you know ? The Indo-European tounges are systematicaly similear that is trough regular sound shift and regulat grammatical change they change by rules not by random.

    Not all languages in Europe are Indo-European some few are Finno-Ugric and one Bausqe has no living relativs. And Turkic languages like Turkish.

    These cannot be reconstructed to Proto-IndoEuropean because they are not Indo-European tounges

  • AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! this is the most funny video on utube :D i speak 3 languages, but still, you just took those 4 language branches who are very familiar and took out all the hundreds of languages which are totaly different, and when you even compare Svasa Soror Eor Sister Schwester they are totaly different, they sound for you familiar because your brain know that they all mean and adopt it, btw their are 6.500 languages, compare them

  • @MultiPropagandaPanda I used Indo-European languages as an example. But I guess you don't even know any about that nor sound law change or the compariative method. Hell I odn't even think you what Indo-European languages are. I used them as example because they are the most spoken languages in the world. No they are not tottaly diffrent the root is from Proto-Indo-European *swésōr meaning sister and only sound diffrent because of regular sound shift in the daughter tounges

  • @Eopyk you cant ignore all the other ones, try to use ALL languages and compare them, then you will see that the story about tower of babel works perfectly, its work so much perfectly that every scientist agree that 7% of what is spoken is being memorized by the one who hear it only. You only took a little piece of similar languages, but the bible say every nation and tribe was devided by different language.

  • @MultiPropagandaPanda I don't here I used small example of Indo-European language Indo-European is a language familiy.

    Languages have ecolved out of common anchestors.

see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MultiPropagandaPanda NO, they differted over time. we know this because some words are similar and some are not. fictional example If you have a plam tree but no whales with the first language using humans, the word palm tree will sound similar in all languages. whale will not. a tigre is a good real example.

    second reason why we know this is that languages differcified since the middle ages. (recently it's in reverse because of global communications)

  • Listen moron, bible say clearly EVERY humanchild was confused and spread trough out the world. but you only talk about europe and Even their you fail. Their are similarities because over the centuries people learned many new words while going a trip.But thanks for the laughter. :D you cant summ up linguistic and bible study in 50 second. lmao

  • Hi Kate. I did now fix some of the spelling/typing mistakes in the discription bar. And well I did this in a kind of hurry and now in advance I think as long as people understand what I trying say or my message then that is what counts in the end.

    All love and respect

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more