Sequoia Part 3 Altered results are easily exported into WinEDS.wmv

Sequoia Part 3: Verification supports the hacked ROM chip with altered results that are easily exported into Sequoias WinEDS central tabulator program.

Because both systems exchange data before and after the election with the Sequoia WinEDS central tabulator, this suggests that the data formats are at least similar if not identical in all Sequoia's equipment and Software.

The danger of fraudulent firmware is widely recognized by nationally experts. It is well known how to design a vote-stealing program so that it can avoid detection: the program takes care not to cheat in any circumstance where someone can compare the actual votes cast with the programs computed results.

Reverse engineering allows construction of fraudulent firmware even without access to trade-secret source code.

Security vulnerabilities in WinEDS 3.1 which is also used in Maricopa County, Arizona.

WinEDS is an election data system used for preparing ballot definitions for Sequoia voting machines before elections, and for cumulating results from Sequoia voting machines after elections.

The Princeton University report Vote-stealing firmware can avoid detection.

Summary: The WinEDS election-management software is known to be insecure, based on studies done by the State of California and now in the Princeton examination it was noticed some of the same weaknesses in WinEDS that were previously reported elsewhere.

For complete Princeton University report and 90 minute video go to:




http://citp.princeton.edu/voting/advantage/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Sequoia
• Election
• Fraud
• Maricopa
• Princeton
• University
• AUDITAZ
• EDA
• investigations
• AUDIT-AZ
• Defense
• Alliance
• Voting
• Equipment
• Andrew
• Appel
• Brakey
• Arizona
• Logic
• and
• Accuracy
• vote
• stealing
• firmware