CORE podcast, Jan 1, 2008

Podcast from CORE Ottawa, hosted by Ian Juby. Website of the week, myth of the day, and comments on the recent PBS/NOVA show on the Intelligent Design trial.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Citizens
• for
• origins
• research
• and
• education
• creation
• science
• evolution
• Ian
• Juby

[TheScienceFoundation]

@InternetDiscipIe It's good to see you finally realize that Pasteur's work had absolutely nothing to do with the initial generation of self replicating cells.

There maybe hope for you yet.

[InternetDiscipIe]

@InternetDisciple Whoops there goes my creationist retardation again, mistaking Pasteur's work for anything that even remotely applies to the biochemical origin of life.

It doesn't and my inability to give an example of any such work of Pasteur's should speak volumes.

[InternetDisciple]

@TheScienceFoundation

"Again, his work only involved modern life and in no way applies to the biochemical origin of life."

Again, there is no evidence for the 'life from non-life' fairy tale. What makes you mistakenly believe in something so obviously unscientific?

(And, dear readers, remember that TSF has yet to admit that Pasteur stated in the law of biogenesis that life comes from life. As far as you know, dear readers, he is still ignorant of that fact.)

[InternetDiscipIe]

@InternetDisciple Disregard that retardation on my part. I actually realize that the work Pasteur did only involves modern life. Readers can easily read through the beating I've taken and see that I was completely unable to give a single example of Pasteur's work that applies to anything other than modern life.

[InternetDisciple]

@TheScienceFoundation

"So which work of Pasteur's do you think applies to the biochemical origin of life?"

There is no biochemical origin of life {life from non-life}. What make you mistaken think that there is, my friend?

[TheScienceFoundation]

@InternetDisciple Again, his work only involved modern life and in no way applies to the biochemical origin of life.

Let me know which part you still don't understand.

[InternetDisciple]

@TheScienceFoundation

"Because you're trying to imply that his work applies to the origin of life,"

I am just pointing out that it is stated in the law of biogenesis that life comes from life. And there is no evidence for the 'life from non-life' fairy tale anyway.

[TheScienceFoundation]

@InternetDisciple So which work of Pasteur's do you think applies to the biochemical origin of life? Be specific.

[InternetDisciple]

@TheScienceFoundation

"Because my point is that his work only involved modern life. The fact that you're unable to give an example of his work that involves anything other than modern life supports my point."

I am very glad that you are admitting that it is not your point that the above would support the 'life from non-life' fairy tale. However, if you are saying that your above point supports the 'life from non-life' position, please let me know.

[TheScienceFoundation]

@InternetDisciple Because you're trying to imply that his work applies to the origin of life, it does not. His work solely involved modern life.

Let me know which part you still don't understand.