WTC No Plane Truth (Part 19)
Loading...
6,227
Uploader Comments (muzicmaker2001)
Top Comments
-
Try sticking to the no plane truth here, ok? You were suppose to produce just these two items:
1. Just 15 witnesses of the planes recorded live on 911 with no connection to the media or government
2. Any evidence tracing ANY of the wreckage to the registered flights
Good luck..I smell excuses?
see all
All Comments (342)
-
Yes let's compare car crashes into 4 foot concrete walls at 40 mph to an airliner hitting relatively thin steel with nothing but glass in between at 450 mph, I mean it just makes perfect sense doesn't it???
-
Yep. Those were the excuses I was counting on. Address my previous post...
-
Yep. Those were the excuses I was counting on. Address my previous post...
-
@muzicmaker2001 You never answer.. What about the Pierreli building? the IRS Building? Can you be man enough to admit little planes carved right through steel buildings? watch?v=zxn9pE7OAW0 single engine plane going 120MPH upload.wikimedia. org /wikipedia/en/7/7b/PirelliBuil
dingAfterPlaneCrash .j pg WTC impacts you can't deny watch?v=QbdfwRGFN9c watch?v=lSHm6_FuAFI watch?v=te6ncYbiQH0 watch?v=gkQU3eJvXMY WTC1 impact watch?v=f4I_uuU4N6E
Loading...
"like a beer can"? deceptive gibberish. A 400,000 LB beer can going 600 MPH. Wow who's stupid now?
"images.usatoday. com /news/_photos/2002/04/18plane-inside. jp g"
Its called physics. Look into it. Planes have crashed in to iron buildings before and at much slower speeds and punched straight in. Look at the pics.
beccabratlust 1 month ago
@beccabratlust
You couldn't be on of those plants who travels to multiple pages related to YT defending 911, could ya? So, I'm sure you are unbiased and we should believe you?
muzicmaker2001 1 month ago 3