Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Gridlock: Hell on Wheels by Drew Carey and Reason.tv

Reason.tv Host Drew Carey examines the costs and consequences of traffic jams and explores several solutions that can get our roads moving. How does a speedy trip on the "Drew Carey Freeway" sound?...  
 
Customize

More From: ReasonTV

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

40 ratings
Sign in to rate
6,696 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (30)   Options

Loading...
massivemak (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
just fuckin ride a motorbike no jams no hassel more birds more sun more fun plus you can roll into work everymorning like arnold scwartsnigger.
TruthAxe (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
But, but, but Drew. If traffic congestion gets solved by private initiate (aka market forces), whatever are the useless utopian schemers -- the politicians and bureaucrats -- going to do?
hellofaname (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
hopefully nothing
uploadJ (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Josh lives 16 miles from work ... we've got to find a way to get Josh to work quicker".

Move Josh closer to work.
.
.
.
AshillaBeige (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Privatizing roads relieves the tax payer. Private highways are more efficient, and accidents are attended to faster. The upkeep is better. You pay a toll for each use instead of paying MORE via taxes for unlimited use. It also encourages people to bike to work.
Usage does NOT increase. If you build more roads, thousands more cars aren't going to appear out of no where. A lot of pollution comes from cars starting and stopping, and idling in traffic.

The government isn't entitled to the roads.
thoughtsurfer1 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
L.A. should have built an extensive public rail transport years ago. This is what happens when you depend on cars too much.
n5667 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They did, it got dismantled in the 1950s and 60s to make way for cars... Of course, the freeway system only got half way to completion when the oil crisis hit, so they stopped building freeways to focus on public transportation -- except they did neither.
j95lee (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That would cost money, and building anything in America is time consuming and cost ineffective process.

There's Metro, but remember - this country ain't like Japan, where if you get off public transportation, you're reasonably close to home. Here when you get off, someone has to pick you up, and you're probably back on the freeway. Or you take the bus again.

Besides, I think Angelenos will tire of the hectic subway scene. We already pay 4 bucks for coffee, just build more private lanes.
IntoEternity0329 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Me too!
allixpeeke (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Wonderful, practical, and effective! :D

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.