Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

UFO NASA's unexplained tether overload incident

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,327,608
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 24, 2006

Tether incident unexpected electric overload. UFO during Live Nasa transmission

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Lens artifacts and out of focus particles (likely dust or ice) in low earth orbit (i.e. gravity) which explains the trajectory in some. Those who claim these are miles in diameter, I assume you also believe the tether is at least a 1/2 mile wide, right? Sorry, it's thin as a match stick (2-3 mm). And for the going behind the tether part? Read up on optical phenomenon. Moving on.

  • @Cymbalz4Lyfe Well now you know

see all

All Comments (6,648)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All those space lice in the picture were a bit distracing, made me itch. LOL

  • Change the title to 'explained' and remove 'overload', erase the bullshit Sereda commentary and you'll have some scientifically interesting NASA footage, nothing more.

  • ok now we know...what nxt?

  • @VendPrekmurec The tether incident was filmed in 1996. So.. about the time you were born. Why don't you smoke a bowl and pick up a book. :d

  • @yugrules "how come the artifacts appear after the tether has broken if they are dust or ice?"

    I think people are falling back on the ice/dust explanation because that is what it typically is. The reason why the particles appear after the tether breaks is because the particles are part of the tether that broke, simple as that.

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot how come the artifacts appear after the tether has broken if they are dust or ice? also if it was dust and ice it would all have to be so close to the camera, meaning that there would be a MASSIVE cloud of dust and ice and hence would be thicker and harder to see into, also considering that, if its so close to the lens there is no way they could move in different directions due to gravity.

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot arent you just a cute little skeptic :D

  • They're not UFOs they're Santa Claus

  • @gorillazhead daj jebi se

  • @VendPrekmurec Blah blah blah potato blah, quit being a troll and beating a dead meme with a stick, seriously, shut the fuck up.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more