The election so far. Hilary comes back with wins in RI, TX, and OH. The song and dance continues. What is the ultimate objective, who is the "chosen one", that is the question. First it was Hilary then Obama now Hilary again. Is someone a "sham" candidate to give us the illusion of choice? Which one? Ron Paul wins! Dennis Kucinich wins too! The real fun is about to begin with this dog and pony show. What's up with Huckabee? Spoiler for Paul? Illusion of "conservative" choice? Positioning for a race in 4 years? Wants to be VP? We'll see.
Of course there is a connection there. Also Tyson Foods. But to assert that Obama is less beholding to corporate interests is to deny who his backers are. Additionally Obama's advisors are downright scary. I'm NOT a fan of Hilary either it should be noted.
tenebroust 3 years ago
I am very surprised that you and very few other people make the simple connection between Clinton, Arkansas, WalMart, Sam Walton, China, Mexico, NAFTA, GAT, WTO, World Bank, etc.
stone1home 3 years ago
All voting is suspect, but let's also not forget that Obama's wife was the head of a giant food company which did a lot of laying off of people. The real difference between these candidates is not real, they both have the same backers, big money and corporations.
tenebroust 3 years ago
The primary election results in Ohio are extremely suspect; dubious. And, through even the most casual study of Clinton's past versus Obama's past reveals huge and very important differences. She was a corporate lawyer for WalMart. He was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the Univ. of Chicago.
stone1home 3 years ago
My cat wanted to be in this video as you can see him at several points in it. He's a ham.
tenebroust 3 years ago