Amtrak Whac-a-Mole
Uploader Comments (dc3rdrail)
Top Comments
-
Why do people continue to argue about this??!!. Amtrak was formed because of the loss of ridership due to the rising empire of the airlines that has fallen. We have to face the fact that we need rail service. We are a country that needs to see a change like Europe where rail is a vital role. Does anyone see this???!!!!. The U.S. Government demands that Amtrak makes money, but they have been so good at waisting it.
-
I am stationed in Germany. Yesterday, I spent 30 Euro [$40 give or take] on a ticket that would have allowed me and 4 others to travel on any local or regional services [anything without InterCity/InterCity Express equipment/amenities] on all of Deutsche Bahn all weekend. One of the legs of my trip, Frankfurt to Wiesbaden, was literally standing room only. Deutsche Bahn does a simply incredible job, with frequent, punctual, fast, and reliable service. Amtrak should be modeled upon this company.
All Comments (43)
-
AMTRAK ROCKS!!!
-
Amtrak is wonderful. America ought to pay for passenger rail service all across the USA. Amtrak - it's the right thing to do.
-
We know the current president hates AMTRAK. We know the current board are nothing more than hacks.
But let's face the big problem is the management that entrenched in the entire system. It's an "incestuous" self serving entity.
-
very good points!! i work for Amtrak and its amazing the "enron style" accounting and calculating is STILL the same!! i know our workforce isnt the best, but i think you can clearly see management is the real problem.
-
"commuter fares" rob amtrak of money it needs to spend on the rest of the system. Amtrak is bigger than just the northeast corridor.
-
youre right on so many levels. Amtrak is intended for the use of non commuter passengers and so called "commuter fares" rob amtrak of money it needs to use on the rest of the system. Amtrak is far bigger than just the northeast corridor!
Hate to tell you but Amtrack was not originally for
commuters! My taxes along with practicly the rest of
the country pay for commuters like you in the east and now in the west. Plus, the scam of double dipping;
Amtrack funds + federal mass urban transit funds!
M1CHAZZ 4 years ago
Amtrak is defined by Congress as being for "inter-city" rail transportation, defined as trips of 90 miles or more. Philadelphia and NYC are 91 track miles apart, and for 30 years Amtrak continued offering "inter-city" commuting fares at reasonable, historical, marginal-cost-covering rates until 2005. Commuter rates have gone up 90% in two years, and commuters now pay more than the inflation-adjusted Amtrak full fare was in the railroad's early years. Amtrak costs $5/year per U.S. citizen.
dc3rdrail 4 years ago
If you actually get things changed, don't forget about us west-coasters.
alphlife 4 years ago
I'm all for keeping the West Coast healthy, too. Since originally getting involved in rail advocacy over the specific East Coast issue covered in the video, I've been convinced by the homework I've done that inter-city rail needs better federal attention and care than it's getting, and deserves way better support, both economically and in political attitudes, than it's gotten for many years now.
dc3rdrail 4 years ago
hmmm...strong opinion...watever you do, do it for amtrak...thanx for the video, good research
saveamtrak 5 years ago
I appreciate your comment. I'm actually quite pro-Amtrak and pro-rail in general, but I and about 2,000 other Amtrak-based job commuters were badly harpooned by the bad rail politics guiding Amtrak in Washington. Raising fares on job commuters by $20 a day on 11 days' notice was an unconscionable, anti-social act, and my research has shown that it was most likely just a politically motivated "hit" to prepare Amtrak for an administration death blow and privatization of the NEC.
dc3rdrail 5 years ago