Declan Ganley Lisbon Treaty 2 European Constitution -1/3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,773
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 13, 2009

13 September 2009 - Libertas founder Declan Ganley has told a news conference in Dublin that he is re-entering the debate on the Libson Treaty because of the astonishing degree of misrepresentation on the Yes side. The Yes side has resorted to lying in their desperation and that the guarantees are meaningless.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • President Of The European Union Tony B'liar has a current death toll over 655,000 - About 500 deaths per day throughout Iraq!

    So thats plenty of jobs in the (EU) military... ever been to Iran?!?!?

    Art. 42.3 TEU of the Lisbon Treaty: "Member States shall undertake progressively to improve their military capabilities."

    Art. 42.3 TEU: "Member States shall make civilian and military capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy"

  • No, only Boot Licking scum like yourself know...

    There are people in this world who will not cower from the truth...

    your just not one of them!

see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Your little friend is still running around, shrieking about "jigaboos" qnd inviting everybody to look at "black rape" videos.

    Such a proud, white patriot...

    Is everybody on your little secret frind list this impressive?

    Have I pointed out to you that you are an idiot recently?

    No?

    You're an idiot Fester!

  • Hey Fester, there's a real head-the-ball who's been rolling around on my profile shouting about "jigaboos" and "ragheads" for the last four hours it seems...

    There's nothing on his profile except your little avatar so I can only assume that he is one of your little secret patriots.

    I'm afraid he's going to hurt himself, perhaps you can help him?

    Oh and nice work and the 2,000 years of blood thing... you set 'em up and I'll knock 'em down, eh Fester?

  • Gee, I dunno IUD...

    If I reply to your last meandering, humourless post am I gonna get another "duh... I don't understand" response?

    Hey, I reckon you're a bit of a Tea Bagger...

    What did you make of Nashville?

  • @BeamassiveLoss03,

    Ah! But that indeed is your delusional world! and at least you now admit to seeing it so!

    ..surely this is where lurks that IUD nasty nasiz alter ego..Though I doubt even you could flatter your fantasies with 'camp'.

    As for yours truly,

    as you are google prince(ess)

    Kindly type in 1488, mud, jew, N*g etc. nd see if you get one hit anywhere in my own comments.

    Though careful! you may find yourself once again in that ever humiliating position of owing me an apology..

  • "drubbing"... fabulous, IUD! That's you up to number 2.

    I think what you have failed to grasp here (and it's hardly as though I haven't explained this to you over and over again) is that I don't see "great monster nassis (sic) coming to get me".

    I see lonely teenagers, who are about two rejections away from going Columbine, shouting 14/88 at each other and swapping hysterical conspiracy theories.

    And I see camp, humourless chaps wandering amongst them collecting "subs" and friendship avatars.

  • @BeamaxLackofgraspo03

    Material?

    all you ever get from me is a well deserved drubbing everytime.

    not that anything I might have to offer would ever be grasped by your hallucinations.

    Nope, you see merely what you want to see-great monster nassis coming to get you-lost in your bedevlied world of Lizards and jackboots, and football fans running the banks, and so few 'comrades' to share your peril.

    Must be really traumatic, but do fight on-it is to our wonderful amusement,

    Your pal, etc.

    I2D

  • (1 of 2)

    So this is you, as part of a "WE" in the vanguard of an "INFORMATION WAR" that is challenging the "media stranglehold"? (hilarious stuff IUD, but we'll. put a tack in that for later)

    We'll also have to put a tack in your unbelievably simplistic misunderstanding of the causes and effects of the social changes that took place in Western society in the 1960s ("Hippy Party"... so much excellent material you give me, buddy... you're too good to me, you know that?)

    Cont...

  • Ps.

    As for fielding candidates, you are typically well off the mark there Betacrass.

    This is an Information War- we are challenging the controlled Media stranglehold on public perception as priority.

    Did the Hippy party ever field a candidate in the 60s?

    No. Did the ideas of the 60s social movement spread into mainstream politics? Yes.

    That is your answer, and it is also why you've 12 friends 0 subs- and I have so many. We have purpose and initiative. An active growing mvmnt.

    You are passe.

  • @BetamaximumLoser03

    I see we are edging close to the ever predicatable outcome..the pattern is invariably as follows.

    1. Beatie attempts to pose a serious question and gets an answer.

    2. A ludicrous howler of cluelessness is the response.

    3. An angry retort then falls back on 'you just nasis, natsiz'

    4. The last resort of "hey I'm just in it for laughs" is produced as the cover to wiggle away.

    We are now about on 4. correct?

    Never changes.

  • Atta boy IUD...

    Off you pop to make ever so many new friends on youtube!

    Pity the number of "subs" you pick up makes no difference to anything whatsoever...

    Until I see a candidate from your realm contest an election and not loose his/her deposit, you'll just be my third favourite punching bag...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more