This shows real-time Point-Blank Testing videos of the top non-webbed competitor model from our field testing v. the webbed Black Spider, followed by freeze-frame analysis of the impact moments. Freeze-frames clearly show how the Black Spider AutoWraps around the ball at impact, while the non-webbed model demonstrates significantly disorganized fingers at the same impact velocity. This AutoWrap effect increases finger strength, prevents finger roll and bounce, increases grip and control, and reduces latex wear.
were did you get that canon???
OSXSandman666 1 year ago
notice how the first guy when he stopped the one shot he kept his hands behind it...on all the other shots he let them slip to the sides. i think the gloves look like they'd work fine but the guy doesnt know what he's doing. also most keepers won't be catching a shot that close with their hands..itd be with their body
123soccerkeeper 1 year ago
They're not. His hands are just up. No goalkeeping positioning at all.
freakfreak12345 2 years ago
I'd say both... there's a reason that NO professional keeper uses 'webbed' gloves... you have to make a 'W'... I *AM* a goalkeeper, and these guys don't know how to catch!
thegambitking 2 years ago
pretty sure that his hands were not in the correct goalie catching position, I could be wrong.... im not a goalie.
pkinman17 2 years ago
The value here is ultimately decided by repeated use, getting past the learning curve. I'd take any performance improvement along with better finger protection, even if it's "only" 10 to20%. Better is better!
oladyoo 2 years ago
As a goalkeeper, I have to say, both gloves look like they suck bad. The non-webbed gloves don't catch anything, and from point blank they should. The Black spider gloves are the same. They catch one of four. Not good. Either the gloves suck or the guy sucks, or both.
freakfreak12345 2 years ago