Ron Paul evolutionary changes have occurred

Please help fund this amazing Ron Paul "Oath" Ad in the top Iowa Newspapers before the January 3rd caucus NOW!

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?338013-Iowa-quot-Oath-quot-Ad-Cam...

http://twrocked.chipin.com/iowa-oath-ad-campaign-chip-in

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron paul
• evolution

[TexTexTex31]

let's see the full clip... so we actually understand the context......

[cbasallie]

@esubadog Actually they mutate into less or more virulant strands in an effort to adapt to new host conditions. A mutation is scientifically observable and the conditions can be created which reproduce the mutation. Technically the word ''evolution'' connotes a complete change in the species irrespective of environment and so it is just a little different. But maybe I'm just playing around with semantics

[cbasallie]

@habibimaya ok. the only thing is that within a species or even a breed, differences in size or mass dont lead us to view them as a different species or bree. the human dutchman is still human and future generations may, for all we know, start to shrink in size...... i don't actually deny the possibility of evolution .....i just view it as being a theory

[habibimaya]

@cbasallie you can view the fact that children outgrow their parents on average? the dutch have grown 6 inches on average since ww2. you can't view this scientifically? i can.

[cbasallie]

@habibimaya Sure. My point however is that a we can recreate the environmental conditions which cause a mutation and we can ''observe'' this. We can ''reproduce''. To reproduce and observe an act of nature is scientific. So I'm saying that mutations are scientifically observable while ''evolution'' is still a theory since we have never ''reproduced'' and ''observed'' a creature ''evolve'' into a different creature. We only observe ..so far...mutations

[habibimaya]

@cbasallie but none of this explains creationism. creationism and evolution are two totally different schools for thought. i believe in both as both are self evident.

[habibimaya]

@cbasallie evolution, in fact, is driven by mutations. mutating is part of the evolving process, so by observing mutations, you are observing parts of evolution. seemingly "normal" characteristics as our ten fingers and ten toes or our two eyes or our relatively hairless skin are ultimately the product of mutations that took shape over the many hundreds of millions of years during which animal life has been evolving. you can view generations of humans getting bigger and witness evolution.

[cbasallie]

@habibimaya You're describing mutations I agree All life is created so that it can adapt to environmental changes Mutations are scientifically observable and changes in environment can be produced which help recreate those mutations (tanning beds lol)

Darwins birds, were observed to have grown longer beaks during drought season BUT were observed to have ''mutated'' back to short beaks during rainy seasons So technically ''evolving'' has never been observed ''Mutating'' has been observed

[BasicInsB4LvingEarth]

He says it so sarcastically! Ron Paul is Bible scholar and has a strong command of the scriptures! There's a reason this is a 10s snippet. Taken out of context I bet.

[habibimaya]

@niqqaracci i guess you haven't seen the new ape skull from 2 million years ago they are trying to claim is the missing link between humans and apes. surely to god you have heard the phrase, missing link? if its not evolutionists that think we came from apes, who is it that is claiming there is a missing link? to say evolutionists don't claim we came from apes is rediculous and flat out...a lie. if we both evolved from a similar ancestor. why did the apes stop developing? pure make believe!!

[esubadog]

@habibimaya Viruses evolve into new forms that require constant new vaccines. THIS is evolution.