Pro Life vs. Pro Choice - DNC 08
Top Comments
All Comments (160)
-
@qxy333 - Christians do not hate and refute everything scientific. What an asinine thing to say. But thanks to the pro-death to unborn infants group that 30% has now increased to what number? Why bother with all the science done to make it safer for babies if you're going to then turn around and murder them before they have a chance to be born?
-
@Sueezee1 Have you read the Huffington Post today. More abortionists be trialled for third degree murder.
-
@qxy333 It is science and developments in our understanding of neurophysology that are the main argument for extending legal protection to the unborn child.
-
@WilliamBroichYAY Very impressed with your agrument. Sueezee1 is a professional pro-abortion agitator.
-
@Sueezee1 I can see you are getting agrivated by this argument... anyway I done arguing with you I still consider this a victory on my part due to the fact coming up with valid points and your just copying what I said to take up space to make your comment seem bigger to draw attention to it. you can reply if you want but just know that my opinion has not changed and it never will. And you opinion probably has not changed. and no im not giving up im just ending the argument because I know I won.
@greekalicia - sure i would eat the chicken before the baby, but Humans cause so much damage to the environment that overpopulation would make ALL LIFE on Earth a bad place. If you were god would you create humans on Earth?
ZAGGNUT1 10 months ago 6
Before 1820, 75% of babies didn't survive. Thanks to science discovering vaccination and improvements in medicine and sanitation this was reduced to 30%. Now these Christians hate and refute everything scientific.
qxy333 6 months ago 2