Anti-Gravity / Cold Fusion Explained In Detail: A New Era In Physics Pt. 17 of ?
Uploader Comments (seattle4truth)
Top Comments
-
Well, I think that this area of energetic disconnect might be caused by a property of space time it self..I've been working on an Idea that can define the properties of spatial permeability that might be able to explain this. :)
All Comments (31)
-
I can make a computer simulation of this theory if you want. I did my thesis on computational physics.
-
5stars! People must see this, but so many will lose interest when faced with words they don't understand. Agreed if it's not Rebecca Black it doesn't get views it seems :(
Boss narration imo
-
So sad that this only has 3,731 views when stupid stuff like "Friday" has millions... We need more smart people! Thanks for the amazing information!! <3
-
there must be a repelling force between proton and electron, but how and what? it can be only released/charged in steps, puzzling..
-
4:09 what does that have to do with what your talking about?
-
Why is the gravitomagnetic fields of both electrons and protons amplified when the rate of change in energy between them becomes zero?
-
Hey nice video I like it, I think, good job!
-
Myth-busters recently "debunked" Tesla's 'oscillator device' (the one purported to almost take down a half-built sky scraper in NYC in the 1900's). Now that we know how to calculate the vibrational speed of a given atom, wouldn't Tesla's device be quite feasible to build? All we would need to do is create an artificial vibrational force slight out of sync on both the high point and low point of the atom's natural vibration wave: a slightly out of step impedance match, timed correctly = crash!?
-
I understand the impedence matching better now.
@seattle4truth: When I see the picture at 02:39 I get this strange feeling..
Because those in and out motions look EXACTLY like the wrong 2-D wave Nassim Haramein was talkin about.
Maybe the electron also does a 3-D Vortex around its path.. just like the planets do around the sun. But in the atom the sun would be the circles in the picture, circling also as a 3-D vortex around something bigger: the nucleus.
I have no idea what I'm talkin about, but what do you think? :)
eneaenea9 1 year ago
@eneaenea9 no. because an electron is not in the particle form while its circling.
the graph was just a 2d representation. you cant visualize an electron as a particle / planet though, as i will explain in part 18
also photons do not travel through space as a particle, and they are not physically moving in a wave.
Nassim is wrong on that aspect. Photons don't travel like a spiral.
seattle4truth 1 year ago
This one felt like a good ending to the series, especially due to the "call to arms" to the audience to help develop the theory... I was in Fourier class a few days ago and some physics majors were talking about maxwells equations and apparently that is some very very difficult stuff... so I am worried about digging into the math and finding that I have to learn EM-theory :*( ....
ChaeoS117 1 year ago
@ChaeoS117 Ending??? We are far from done mon frere. :D
And BTW... if you want to mention it to them... Come to them straight with the math. And say that you can show how planck's constant is irrelevant. That is what will impress them, if anything.
seattle4truth 1 year ago 5
Thanks for the thought recognition ; )
Snowflake70 1 year ago
@Snowflake70 yeah man thanks for bring up the clutch thing... its a great analogy
seattle4truth 1 year ago