Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Shorter, But Little Clearer Version of Pentagon Impact Video

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,441
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2007

with this smaller, but a little clearer, version of the Pentagon security video, you can see a few more things not visible in the other one. this includes the planes tail, its blue paint, and the smoke trail it leaves due to its speed.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Only now they just reveal that building 7 was on fire for 7 hours until it collapsed like as if I'm so stupid for believing that it was bombed. But hello, then why did the WTC collapse in 30 minutes? Everything is hype backwards. If it's recommended as good it's bad. If it's "I'm loving it", it's really "I'm hating it". YOU NAME IT it is hype backwards.

  • Don't forget, it hit several light posts. The smoke is either from a damaged engine, or it's fuel spray from ruptured wing tanks.

  • not only are you ignoring lots of evidence but you're not even reading what im saying right. that, coupled with you insulting me, is making you a waste of time. come back when you can hold a mature, appropriate debate.

    BLOCKED

  • i just told you they took pictures of plane debris at the Pentagon and pieces of the engines along with the black boxes. you're not listening at all and yet are calling me the sockpuppet. lose the ass-like personality.

    have you even read their reports?

    i uploaded it, but since it's pretty evident you have ignored quite a lot of evidence it doesn't surprise me.

    three have been officially released.

    i said museumS, not one specifically and i didnt say ALL of the debris is on display.

  • @911NeverForget,

    No, actually you are. You haven't answered ONE of my questions. Where are the engines and their remains from Pentagon hit? where's the Pentagon black boxes and recordings? Where is the piecing together of physical evidence by the 9/11 commission or NTSB? Where is the 3rd Pentagon camera footage you speak of? Only 2 have ever been officially released? Where's this museum you think it's all on display plus souvenirs of ACTUAL physical evidence ? Your a sockpuppet aren't you?

  • i just told you everything they released. is that not clearing things up?

    there isnt 100 Pentagon videos that caught anything interesting. only 3. they have been released. only you guys claim it's the most protected building on the planet. they have no missiles.

    you're changing the subject.

  • @911NeverForget ,

    LOL, whatever dude. The government could quite easily clear this matter up then according to you, like maybe.....showing other footage from the 100 or so Pentagon camera's from the most protected building on the planet (hence the patriot missiles on location there but.........funnily they weren't deployed! go figure! Or how about releasing some of the FBI taken footage from private businesses? or the motorway bypass camera's ? Simple really, just clear it? Nothing to hide?

  • i love how what i say isnt evidence you do exactly the same thing with your comments and i'm supposed to believe it.

    the dust analysis wasnt official. there was no thermite, let alone thermate or nano thermite, and it isnt used for CDs anyway.

    explosions do not always mean bombs. MANY things can create an explosion.

  • in other words, dismissing what disagrees with your views. tons of people have said there was a plane. pictures of plane debris and the black boxes AND pieces of the engines exist. footage, albeit blurry, of the plane exists. none of that stuff exists for a missile. not a single thing.

  • @911NeverForget ,

    "been said as plain as day from many different people" ?

    "afterwards it was either made into souvenirs or put in museums for public viewing."?

    That's not "evidence" I'm afraid. Evidence would be the dust analysis done from samples PROVING 'nano thermite' was used in the demolition of all 3 buildings, the evidence from those IN and AT the scene who heard, saw, felt and were hurt by "secondary explosions". Those who came out of the Pentagon "SINGLE" hole who said "no plane"

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more