1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS 2009 Chevrolet Malibu

Who will win the bel air or the Malibu

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 1959
• Chevrolet
• Bel
• Air
• VS
• 2009
• Malibu
• cool
• crash
• test
• smash
• no
• noo
• why
• the
• it
• is
• hi
• wtf
• Hello
• people
• reading
• this
• have
• good
• day

[myphonyaccount]

Surface rust, dirt and paint dust are different from structural rot. X frames and unreinforced A pillars are just shoddy engineering. They simply didn't care about safety until liberal regulations made them care.

[chinookking97]

@myphonyaccount it wasn´t a fair fight. look, the ´59 was old and rusty... and the malibu not!

[chinookking97]

i´d say the beauty was very rusty. also, a crash from this angle is not very usual, when you drive carefully...

[chinookking97]

@myphonyaccount That ´59 impala with 300 hp needs some 15 liters of fuel per 100 km... that´s not that bad.

and they ARE practical.

[chinookking97]

@myphonyaccount I tried, but io didnt see!

[Supergungun]

@myphonyaccount I think its the other way around. People are much more obese than they used to be

[myphonyaccount]

@Supergungun There are plenty of new cars with lots of legroom and big trunks. The dashboards come out farther and there are center consoles, people sit lower, but they are very comfortable on long drives unlike old cars which were notorious for driver fatigue. If somebody is so obese they can't fit into a modern car, maybe they have lifestyle and health issues that need to be addressed rather than demanding bigger and fatter cars to accommodate their problems.

[Supergungun]

@myphonyaccount And so potent against you. New cars are ugly, soulless, have no leg room, or trunk space.

[Supergungun]

@myphonyaccount I did, that's why my opinions are so strong.

[myphonyaccount]

@Supergungun If your soul is defined by the car you drive, then you never had a soul. And you're sticking to old notions about old rubber moldings because you want to believe them. New cars are better. Try one, you'll see.