Motley Crue - Saints of los angeles live Jimmy Kimmel HQ
Uploader Comments (tobbli90)
Top Comments
-
Mick mars is amazing!!!!!
All Comments (94)
-
the scream at the begining is epic
-
@ralphy329 i do agree with u how ever take into account he is getting old and if uve ever been on stage as a front man the ammount of energy u need to put in to keep the audience excited and such is enough to wind anyone im 18 and i get wided keeping the audiences atention its not an easy position and the ammount of time he spends jumping and running around the stage its a wonder he doesnt have a stroke
-
@ralphy329 i agree it seems he gets winded pretty easily but he does run around on stage he doesnt do that in the studio and plus he doesnt get takes live but he'll sing a part several times to get it right but hes doing pretty good for a guy in his 40's
-
Motley is Awesome
-
the voice is tired but it still kicks asses!
-
@PhilippRoxie they also appear on the studio version as gang vocals at the end...
-
I love motley crue but it seems there signer get winded pretty quickly. I have nothing against the guy. But it seems he doesn't hold parts as long as in the studio version.
-
@PhilippRoxie Because all the bands they are part of (Buckcheery, PapaRoach, Sixx AM and Trapt) were part of the CrueFest. I think because of this, they were invited to sing in "Saints of Los Angeles" track and this performance (all of them on stage) happened in every CrueFest gig.
-
@PhilippRoxie thats there back up singers haha
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there are terrible live, better just stick to the studio!
WIsportsfan98 2 years ago
I think that they are better live than in studio. I love the live sound of the most bands.
tobbli90 2 years ago 11