William Lane Craig vs Bart Ehrman 1/12

A debate on the historicity of Jesus' Resurrection between the prominent Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and the prominent New Testament historian Bart D. Ehrman.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[digbystills1967]

Craig appeals to authority a LOT.

[dunexxi]

Actually it's kind of sad that after two thousand years, this is the very best that Christians can come up with. FACTS like this would get laughed out of any court.

[dunexxi]

With logic like this (Using the book to prove that the book is true) I can prove that Gandalf rose from the dead, and was taken to the undying land by a host of Elves and Valar.

[dunexxi]

Craig is the most dishonest academic I have ever heard. He knows that he is relating one logical fallacy after another, and when corrected, he refuses to acknowledge it. I have more respect for Fred Phelps. At least he seems to believe the nonsense he spouts.

[LatencyProblem]

William Lane Craig, master of rhetoric, master salesman

[Albania3802]

To understand Scripture God has to open your eyes and your ears. Your translation of resurrection is like the movie the waking dead. If you want to know the truth then read a book called "The Holy Seed". In it you will find that Abel, Jacob and Jesus are the same man. The theory of resurrection was only to convince the stubborn Jews at that time. St.Paul gave you only milk not solid food. Truth: I am Levi the son of Israel and religion belongs only to me. Isa 42:8,9

[DetroitTeaTime]

Amen! Are these guys for real, or are they just trolls?