Literally - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editor
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like MerriamWebsterOnline's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike MerriamWebsterOnline's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add MerriamWebsterOnline's video to your playlist.
Published on Apr 12, 2012
How to use a word that (literally) drives some people nuts. See more videos at http://www.merriam-webster.com/video/...
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
Advertisement
-
1:51
Irregardless - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnlineFeatured
14,671
-
1:56
"Mispronunciations" That May Be Fine - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
14,302 views
-
1:57
The Awkward Case of "His or Her" - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
9,885 views
-
2:11
What Ironic Really Means - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
15,137 views
-
2:01
A vs. An - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
7,060 views
-
1:55
Defenestration - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
3,983 views
-
9:18
Stephen Fry & Christopher Hitchens - Blasphemyby pangeaprogressredux
65,119 views
-
2:12
Gallium Induced Structural Failure of a Coke Canby NurdRage
2,113,188 views
-
2:02
Healthy vs. Healthful - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
1,728 views
-
1:38:10
Zacherley Archivesby Finispshellnut
6,083 views
-
4:40
Kory Stamper Appears on Anderson Liveby MerriamWebsterOnline
3,215 views
-
2:02
Ghost Word - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
7,360 views
-
1:53
Reign vs. Rein - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
9,076 views
-
5:40
MADtv - Dr. Kylie - Fertilityby bhamdodger
269,073 views
-
1:50
Okay? - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
25,001 views
-
1:56
Cop - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
2,913 views
-
1:45
Affect vs Effect - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby Merriam-Webster Online
14,480 views
-
1:58
I before E - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
11,551 views
-
1:40
Hat Trick - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
4,975 views
-
1:38
Doozy - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editorby MerriamWebsterOnline
6,962 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
SpinozasPsyche 1 year ago
I literally murder anyone who uses this word incorrectly.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
FHomeBrew 1 year ago
This is literally confusing....
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (41)
Adrian Sanchez 2 months ago
"curious about the composition of your offspring"...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
urganodevotaton 4 months ago
To point out easily avoidable confusing uses/misuses of words evolving out of people's confusion or disregard for clarity has its place. If you just accept any development that's popular you will often end up with sloppy, confusing and even inaccurate writing and speech.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
bobtheduck 4 months ago
There are an awful lot of people here who don't understand the dynamic nature of language. Most words are no longer used in a manner consistent with their original meanings. That's to be expected. This happens in every language, and overt efforts to prevent language from changing and diversifying are silly at best. Interestingly, the thing that's most kept language in place and unified (within national boundaries) is television. Some regional dialects in England pre TV are almost unrecognizable.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
samanark 4 months ago
To me, there is a difference between morphology and a bunch of people just using a word incorrectly. The use of "literally" as an intensifier and in its legitimate form become nearly indistinct since people will tend to regard it in a kind of half intensifier, half legitimate way, thus the word loses meaning. "Virtually" is a much better replacement since it literally means what people tend to use "literally" to mean. (i.e. "My kids were so hyper, they were virtually bouncing off the walls.")
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
urganodevotaton 4 months ago
Even intelligent people degrade language. And the degradation can end up becoming accepted by dictionaries despite being confusing and stupid. I like Pope's usage of "literally" though because rather than just using it as an emphasis of the sameyness of each day he is sort of literally denying that his present day is not a yesterday and that is awesome.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
urganodevotaton 4 months ago
Even intelligent people degrade language. And the degradation can end up becoming accepted by dictionaries despite being confusing and stupid. I like Pope's usage of "literally" though because rather than just using it as an emphasis of the sameyness of each day he is sort of literally denying that he has todays and that is awesome.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Exgrmbl 4 months ago
well, language is a mess.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fiann100 5 months ago
Why not say effectively and avoid the confusion?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
IntroSpectre6x3 6 months ago
Muskrat?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
CodeMage 6 months ago
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube