Debate: Does God Exist? Dr Kirk Durston Theist Vs Dr PZ Myers Atheist

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,345
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 1, 2012

Does God Exist? Debate at The University of Alberta, January 26th, 2009. The debate was sponsored by The University of Alberta Atheists and Agnostics, and Campus for Christ.

Dr Kirk Durston is the national director of the New Scholars Society and recently earned a PHD in Bio Physics from the University of Guelph.

Dr Paul Zachary Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (153)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This was a good debate. By PZ Myers's behavior one can quite understand his words. "XXI century, Bible crap, silly people, nonsense talk, you should be embarassed to spend his time to talk about this, he will have fun and learn with it..." This guy's self image is so inflated that he will never be able to see something greater than it.

  • To end the debate the truth is you can't prove God doesn't exist but you can just not believe in Him... for now. Meyers acknowledges this truth as he has stated so don't get upset cause he doesn't believe.  We will all find out when we die and I'm sure we are all excited to find out!

  • PZ Myers: "I don't always win the debate, but they never do."

  • after this, I think PZ actually believes in God!

  • myers ,WING NUT SCIENCE ? so YOU say .what about all that think YOUR science is WING NUT science ? when you can present arguments with out the ridicule and slander you MAY be on to something that is credible .MAYBE !

  • not one prophecy has ever been disproved .to say that fulfilled prophecy is the result of people writing the answers a hundred years later is interesting to say the least .what will happen when you see a one world government and currency .those were for foretold in days gone by ,care to explain those one off mr myers .

  • mr. myers ! BIBLE bullshit ? you don't believe in the bible .

    so your opinion is superior ? well some people don't believe in your stand .

    RIDICULE IS NOT A FACT that should be in a debate .as you have missed this in all your higher education, study PROFESSIONALISM it will help you lose the ridicule part

  • myers ! you are a master in twisting what was said .brovo ,you are a master twister .for this you do win .

  • dr.pz.myers . please lose the ridicule and be a little more professional in your responses and it might begin to make sense .MAYBE ! .

  • i am amazed that all of the big time atheists open with ridicule and slander ,kinda like the emperors new clothes and the people who said they looked good .

    all of myers dna examples lead no where for me as they can still be explained by a common intelligent designer (at least this is how i see the two arguments )

    between the two i would have to say the KIRK has presented the better argument in this debate regardless of the two stands on this topic.WELL DONE KIRK .

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more