Recent Global Cooling

Answers to Questions 2 and 3 of global warming Quiz 1: Has the globe cooled recently?


GLOBAL WARMING RELATED VIDEOS........

GLOBAL WARMING QUIZ1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX6OnGEEphw
Quiz1 Ans1 (Global warming vs Climate Change?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QUIZ1lOr7dbJA
Quiz1 Ans2 (No warming since 1995?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai6ju28nAyk
Quiz1 Ans3 (Global cooling since 1998?): see Quiz1Ans2
Quiz1 Ans4 (Antarctica gaining ice?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG9PdMlP63c
Quiz1 Ans5 (Solar activity related to GW?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjriD92A1VE
Quiz1 Ans6 (What do the skeptics really say?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBMDwwTdMfs
Quiz1 Ans7 ($Bs on GW research?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbn6-5lbshA
Quiz1 Ans8 (Research grants?): see Quiz1 Ans7
Quiz1 Ans9 (Scientific Consensus?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndNQBJKmkCc
Quiz1 Ans10 (UNIPCC funds research?): see Quiz1 Ans 7

GLOBAL WARMING QUIZ 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n723ndC3tp0
Quiz2 Ans1 (Mercury Warming?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYBC95920Gs
Quiz2 Ans2 (Hockey Stick Graph): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vys9wUl3rZ0
Quiz2 Ans3 (Volcanoes): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6W1KxiLcg8
Quiz2 Ans4 (1934 Heat Wave): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIaQbvDFJ0Y
Quiz2 Ans5 (Bad data): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_JngnDGkOM
Quiz2 Ans6 (No AGW Proof): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb8Omi2ozA4
Quiz2 Ans7 (Shell Game): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcLfw5ZaJIo
Quiz2 Ans8 (GW Petitions): Still researching it
Quiz2 Ans9 (An Inconvenient Deception): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhuxXkONmgY
Quiz2 Ans10 (Warming before 1940): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYgX7tSGbmQ

SNOWMAGEDON: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXDJLcdv0jk

GLOBAL WARMING - MY ASS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVODoTtpOvI

OTHER SOLAR PHYSICS RELATED VIDEOS....

POLE SHIFT -- WE'RE ALL DOOMED: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9-Zr6zpjbM
NASA SOLAR PHYSICS 2010: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_dfxh_S0aw
MASSIVE X-FLARE (2011 Feb 15): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwpCW-BReR8
THE X FLARE ON 9 MARCH 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ubxy1kQVdFk
JAPANESE EARTHQUAKE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vez0TRq15Ak
CME HEADING FOR EARTH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5eZt1nGnc

THE SUN TODAY SERIES
2011 March 31: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHg3VuT6-9g
2011 March 30: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9LqRGLRxng
2011 March 29: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahmjvAsiGVQ
2011 March 28: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0avFp8tCVg
2011 March 27: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfS80jm9B6Q
2011 March 26: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLaIKA3AE5U
2011 March 25: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZzrQjYRr0I
2011 March 24: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgmTWlYA7mg
2011 March 23: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdjVETu78QU

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Global
• warming
• climate
• change
• myths
• space
• environment
• science
• Quiz
• questions
• ice
• Antarctic
• natural
• cycles
• Sun
• Anthropogenic
• global
• hoax
• great
• swindle
• funding
• polls
• IPCC

[TheLDH2020Channel]

Ya man  I watched your newer video on graphs...Nice video.. Thanks again.

[drkstrong]

@TheLDH2020Channel You are welcome

[m1aws]

@drkstrong Is still a big place ;) 53k ppl once. My ex-part (non-a/c) is now an EU conglom. I'll say no more.

Drop the CO2. GW does exist but our winter is not going to be easy :(

[drkstrong]

@m1aws I know of no "scientist" who works for anything but his master. - a retired one.

Oddly I was in the defense industry for 35 years too - the largest in the world. What a coincidence!

[m1aws]

@drkstrong You avoid what you cannot answer. I'm squirming? We are only using words. I said 7% bandwidth and happy.

One site I gave you was the qty of CO2 in %. You do know gasses are different in density?

Read this "org.ntnu.no/solarcells/pages/­C­hap.2.php"

I know of no "scientist" who works for anything but his master. After 35yrs in defence, I should know!!!!

[drkstrong]

@m1aws You are making no sense at all as you try to squirm out of the error ridden claims you have made so far. It started as" 7% of the total CO2" which you cant justify to being something else entirely.

Now where does 3.4% come from? or 3.62%? or 2% of GHGs? I cant find a single justification for those numbers anywhere.

BTW: Johnson Analytics is a energy sponsored PR company who write pseudo scientific reports for anyone who will pay them enough to sell their souls. Try again.

[m1aws]

@drkstrong The planets CO2 was once 40%.

So whats wrong with man returning 3.4% to the total 3.62%CO2 of the Earths 2% total of GW gasses?

Man's contribution is= 0.02x0.0362x0034= 2.4616e-05 The argument is over on CO2.

7% bandwidth 250nm to 2500nm measured by me and that was measuring across the peaks. OK, part of the absorption there is water vapour, but hey. Lets be fair on you!

Of that <7% bandwidth, half is already absorbed. The CO2 debate is like I say, dead in the water.

[drkstrong]

@m1aws Vostok proves my case the CO2 content never went above 280 ppm in 600,000 years of natural variation (count the zeroes!) and the average fro a warm period like now is about 260 ppm. We are now at 390 ppm. Can you subtract and then divide? That is a 44% if we take the pessamistic figure of 270 ppm.

Still no source for the 7% figure, I see! I guess that was made up out of thin air.

PS Voshtok is part of the "AGW adulterated material" - it was forecast by AGW theory, Vostok proved it

[m1aws]

@drkstrong Well, today when I put the kettle on without the lid on, the water was only warming up and there was lots n lots of fine bottles. Can't think what these aromatics were considering I could shove my fingers in without getting burned.

I will contend your findings citing the Vostock cores as an example.

I always try to use (none) AGW adulterated material but..

hypertext org.ntnu.no/solarcells/pages/C­hap.2.php

w w w. johnstonanalytics. com/environment/atmosphere

[drkstrong]

@m1aws The oceans are not saturated no matter what temperature they are at. The oceans currently absorb more CO2 (92BT of carbon) than they release (90BT) so they are not adding to the CO2 in the atmosphere but removing it (see watch?v=l6W1KxiLcg8).

Do you have a source for the 7% figure? I was unable to find one except for bloggers repeating it over and over again. The real figure is 44%. The peak CO2 before 1800 was 270 ppm, it is now over 390 ppm. That is 44% increase, most of it recent.