Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

NIST WTC 7 Report - Press Briefing 8/21/08 pt 6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,010
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 23, 2008

...

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (23456D)

  • The infowars gut gets owned.

    He is a f***ing idiot, just like his master Alex Jones.

  • I'm think he should have been better prepared to address his question to Sunder, but I think it's rather telling that Sunder's answer to EVERYTHING the guys asked is

    "read this, understand it, when you've understood it we can have a conversation."

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No talk of NASA's findings?? That should have been one of the questions. The lady from popular mechanics, "do you have a question si??r" History Channel had a group of children die that day, I would think they would be a bit more supportive.

  • @terrymanning1 Some things everyone needs to know to sort this out:

    watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

  • @iBlindGame Hey, if you can do it better please forget about me and do it!

  • @Skeptic121 Lead with best arguments, eh? You are a fool. These guys limited exposure to themselves throughout the investigation. Damn, one would think a little logic wouldn't be so hard...

    We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

    watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

  • @Skeptic121 All your comments are simply distractions. For evaluating NIST, learn to focus on what's important:

    We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

    watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

  • @terrymanning1 Important for evaluating NIST:

    We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

    watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

  • @terrymanning1 NIST wouldn't talk to scientists or even average citizens, so this guy had to go to someone from the media to get invited to the press conference.  You may not know that NIST was unscientific throughout, but that guy knows. NIST did no tests, and they didn't even release the data from their simulation. If you were to see this in context, it might make more sense to you what was taking place. They haven't provided any definitive answer, yet they act as if they do.

  • @terrymanning1 NIST wouldn't talk to scientists or even average citizens, so this guy had to go to someone from the media to get invited to the press conference. You may not know that NIST was unscientific throughout, but that guy knows. NIST did no tests, and they didn't even release the data from their simulation. If you were to see this in context, it might make more sense to you what was taking place.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more