Freedom and United Nations? Great!

Here is my answer to the new United Nations' contest. Subscribe me, follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/_fonzo - or do anything, if you liked me. =D

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• united nations
• freedom
• contest
• fonzo
• afonso ferreira

[LAIM5]

é isso mesmo xD

[MargaritaPugovka]

o teu years..

[TheGabitaF]

tu dás cabo de mim, Afonso xDD

[Kruttkuse]

I´m sorry, you´ve got some reading to do. Read up on development theories if you this interests you. I can only tell you so much. We produce enough food for the world to be supplied, just unequally distributed. Investing and saving is a vital part in a self-sustaining economy, thus the producers and manufacturers should do this. No, I know many 3rd world countries have yet to do that. And sprouting money into a broken infrastructure does not help.

[naruto2710]

2nd you talked about investing and saving now as i asked, who should do that? 3rd world countries or western countries? if it was easy to invest and save dont u think 3rd world countries would have done that already? that hasn't happened, why? cuz of many reasons, one being that some goverments are corrupt. now if you meant western countries then your an idiot cuz investing and saving=MONEY soooo therefore FOOD NEEDS MONEY!! OUR INITIAL ARGUMENT. about recession, plz research Wall Street Crash!

[naruto2710]

exactly now who should distribute? western countries or 3rd world countries? well from your previous comments i'm assuming ur saying 3rd world countries cuz i said western countries should help 3rd world countries through MONEY and you said we should develop them into independence. now what if a country cant help themselves for various reasons maybe their enviroment or government isnt good therefore western countries should help them with what? MONEY sooo FOOD NEEDS MONEY! OUR INITIAL ARGUMENT

[Kruttkuse]

Wow, that is some ad hominum. Please refrain from those. To distribute is an English expression that means divide among many, or to spread out. In order to produce food you need to invest your savings to increase your next production. I really haven´t been saying anything other than this, I can´t help your confusion.

[naruto2710]

damn you are ridiculousy stupid. first our intial argument was wether food needs money. you said no, i said yes. you basically said food doesnt need money, we produce enough food to supply the world and that its a matter a distribution. now wtf do you mean distribution, please tell me cuz i'm confused. also you said food requires investment and savings, by who? plz answer me that cuz i'm not sure you understand what you're saying. you dont read my comments you just jump from one thing to another

[Kruttkuse]

Can´t you just read my comment? No, I am not American, but that wasn´t my point either. Point is a recession matters little to the rural producers in these starving countries, as their wage is through their total production.

And, no, it´s not as easy as JUST invest and save, and I am not arguing against aid. What I am saying is that we can´t just give food away, because one needs a self-sustaining economy. We don´t need money for the food, because we already have it.

[naruto2710]

i know this is another reply but in your first reply you asked how does food need money and then gave me stupidass stats. now when your arguing you should have summarised or concluded what you were saying and what you were getting at. i might not be smart enough to translate your comment myself or i might translate wrong. please re-read your comments before replying. so yh i just read the first line of your post