Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ron Paul @ CNN Republican Debate PT.6 11-28-07

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,096
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 28, 2007

Ron Paul

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • only ignorant sheep would boo. Those are the dumbasses peeps talk about when they say americans are dumb.  Not me, not u..but those sheep gettin their news from tv.

  • Imagine if RP said calm tone?

    You do realize you're booing peace.

    That would've been the best.

    But still--Ron did good in this debate.

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul pwded Mccain

  • its pretty sad that most of these videos have about a couple thousand hits.. I'm Canadian, and have watched every US debate. I"m totally fascinated by this, and most American's don't seem to give a shit. sad, real sad.

  • i cant believe this guy mccain! he's is out of his mind. ron paul for 08 and on

  • to station themselves in their country, RPaul, according to his statements, would say no BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE CRAZIES WOULDN'T APPROVE! IN OTHER WORDS TERRORISM WORKS WITH RON PAUL!

  • RP's answer would be, again as evidenced by his comments; BECAUSE LUNATICS LIKE BIN-LADEN/AQ DON'T APPROVE AND MIGHT COMMIT TERRORISTS ATTACKS AGAINST US! So, even though the govt. of SA requests assistance- and I don't know if there has ever been a more unanimous decision by the UN than that Hussein should be forced to withdraw from Kuwait- and invites foreign troops (cont.)

  • RP's answer would be, as evidenced by his comments; it means we shouldn't have had troops stationed there in the first place.(Understand? U still with me mattmatt115?) The next question from the listener should be, obviously,; "Why should we have not had troops stationed there?" (BTW, these questions are called 'peeling away the bumper sticker')(cont.)

  • matt115; "Do you honestly believe anybody thinks Al Quaida owns SA?" No. Do you understand sarcasm? But, if you were to take literally what RPaul says then HE DOES think AQ owns SA. When RPaul says his statement "they attacked us (blah blah blah)" the response from the listener should be; "Yeah? And so what does that mean Mr. Paul?" (cont.)

  • That is,of course, since it is AQ that attacked us. So lets take the pronouns out of Ron Pauls statement and put in the noun that they stand for and restate the statement; "Al Quaeda attacked us on 9/11 because we were occupying Al Quaeda's country; Saudi Arabia." Understand?

  • matt115 says; "none of your comments even make ANY literal sense!" They make perfect literal sense because I am explaining what Ron Pauls comments LITERALLY mean. Let's try it again; RPaul says (in a nutshell); " THEY attacked us on 9/11 because we were occupying THEIR country; Saudi Arabia." In case your English isn't very good let me explain; "They" and "Their" are pronouns that substitute for a noun. In this case the noun would be "Al Quaeda" (cont.)

  • On a side note, Ron Paul is the last hope for this country if you like being able to call your home: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or CANADA or even MEXICO!!!

    The wrest of you who haven't yet noticed this happening around you, you really must realize that our chance to keep our national pride(s), different beliefs, is/are diminishing, you really MUST WAKE UP!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more