Play
Upload

Are We Running Out of Resources?

LearnLiberty LearnLiberty·228 videos
54,595
123,990
Like     Dislike 406

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like LearnLiberty's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike LearnLiberty's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add LearnLiberty's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 28, 2011

Prof. Steve Horwitz addresses the common belief that the world is running out of natural resources. Instead, there are economic reasons why we will never run out of many resources. In a free market system, prices signal scarcity. So as a resource becomes more scarce, it becomes more expensive, which incentivizes people to use less of it and develop new alternatives, or to find new reserves of that resource that were previously unknown or unprofitable. We have seen throughout history that the human mind's ability to innovate, coupled with a free market economic system, is an unlimited resource that can overcome the limitations we perceive with natural resources.

Watch more videos: http://lrnlbty.co/y5tTcY

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (1,695)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • BrotherAtticus

    Agreed, but Julian Simon is THE preeminent figure on the topic of resource economics. It's like discussing Christianity without one mention of Jesus.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate BrotherAtticus's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate BrotherAtticus's comment.
    in reply to LucisFerre1 (Show the comment)
  • FurryMurry7

    Ah. I never thought of it like that before. This was a nice conversation. Thanks, buddy! :)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.
    in reply to LucisFerre1 (Show the comment)
  • LucisFerre1

    The incidence of cancer being diagnosed is increasing. Cancer deaths is decreasing because of early detection and better treatment. Also people are living longer today, long enough to possibly die of cancer when they get older instead of dying young from the chicken pox or flu. Obesity is a side effect of being in a land of plenty, and again, psychiatric illnesses being diagnosed is increasing. That doesn't mean that there are more mentally ill people nowadays.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.
    in reply to FurryMurry7 (Show the comment)
  • FurryMurry7

    I watched the video. It was both informative and entertaining!

    But the question is: if food is MORE healthy now than it was 200 years ago, why are there so many health problems that simply didn't exist back then? I understand that in modern America, people live longer, and don't suffer from diseases like polio and rubella like they used to.

    But it seems that we now have a whole array of new problems on a country-wide scale, from cancers to obesity to the various psychiatric illnesses.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.
    in reply to LucisFerre1 (Show the comment)
  • LucisFerre1

    Yup, the "poor" in America, i.e. those in the bottom quintile (20%) of income earners are significantly more likely to be obese and smoke than everyone else. I was referring to the 'food isn't nutritious' jazz. Everything processed is fortified nowadays. People used to acquire vitamin deficiency diseases quite often. It's almost a thing of the past now. Here's a fascinating program, Connections2 with James Burke talking about just this.

    /watch?v=Aif3q1zqkuU

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.
    in reply to FurryMurry7 (Show the comment)
  • FurryMurry7

    I think he's referring to the obesity epidemic in America. In 1776, the percentage of overweight Americans was DRASTICALLY lower than the percentage of overweight Americans today.

    And this isn't just in America. In 2010, the Public Health Association of Australia stated that obesity has overtaken smoking as the number one cause of premature death and illness.

    The article is at: bit [dot] ly/12EUxhY

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FurryMurry7's comment.
    in reply to LucisFerre1 (Show the comment)
  • LucisFerre1

    Time for you to hug a tree.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.
    in reply to SurfrsWithoutBorders (Show the comment)
  • LucisFerre1

    [[It is true that less people are "hungry" now, but ironically, more people are obese, and our food is far less nourishing and possibly poisionous]]

    -

    That's utter nonsense.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.
    in reply to SurfrsWithoutBorders (Show the comment)
  • LucisFerre1

    That's not a problem with oil extraction from sand. That's a problem with releasing polluting waste products (assuming your description is correct).

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucisFerre1's comment.
    in reply to SurfrsWithoutBorders (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later