The Peopling of North Africa: from 40,000 years ago to present.

Based on a lot of reading of Y chr and mtDNA studies, reading up on linguistics and Saharan, Mahgrebian and Nilotic cutlures mixed up with crania studies.

Please excuse the typos: the kids were bouncing on my head as I typed.

As you can guess, I'm not a fan of Afro Asiatic being African in origin from the way it follows the neolithic farmers and herders into Africa, right into the Cameroon area.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Prehistory
• north Africa

[davidcici11]

@Omorose33 Yes that is also very true

[Omorose33]

@davidcici11 Early Europeans at least until 35kya looked like Africans. Even if what she said was true, back migrations from Asia would probably have been more Africans simply coming back.

[davidcici11]

your dates are also way off, you make a mad assumption that Eurasians wiped out the native Africans, which means you claim North Africa originally as a black African homeland, and then you say they stayed in Nubia then around 22kya moved back into North Africa over to Morrocco carrying M1, U6 and EM78??? WTF

LOL First of all M78 doesnt date back 22 kya ago. It is a rather recent sub clade not too recent, but it is estimated to be 17,000 yrs old, and it left Sudan 10.8 kya lol

[davidcici11]

First of all there is no evidence that M1 backmigrated from Asia, given it is absent via Middle East and peaks in Ethiopia at 20%. Secondly U6 backmigrated yes, but U6 is a mutation of L3 that backmigrated, you still have to have a male line, which male line co-existed with these Africans?

And why don't Eurasian male lineages date back to 40,000 years in North Africa? There isn't no evidence of anything you said. Its made up Neo-nazi fantasy.

[sadiq53]

The arabs recently invaded the Northern African areas in the 7th century. There is no documented proof for this video its someones fantasy. Its like Hitlers fantasy of the aryan race . LOL , its completely fantasy. Please anyone read the book 'Black Genesis' by Robert Bauval. Please read established scientist , athropologist , historians etc, eg. Basil Davidson.

[Omorose33]

@LoneMyth ...how many Europeans are direct descendants from Greeks or Romans exactly? Especially Americans who cling to race. How many Europeans are actually "Aryan"? When Europeans who haven't a clue if they're taking from somewhere they have direct lineage, it's fine because as long as it's from Europe it's ok. Meanwhile you reverse the one drop rule when applying race to North Africans or even East Africa, and do not allow people of African descent to indulge in the same standard.

[Omorose33]

What studies are you actually citing and where can people see it?

[Omorose33]

@ninety43 er.. 2-5%? That means almost no modern humans regardless of race have Neanderthal DNA. So, its not especially correct to call white people Neanderthals.

[ninety43]

well I just read on Europe 40,000 yrs ago and it stated,"study conducted by Davis Antropology dept of U.S found that about four percent (ranging from 2 to 5 percent) of modern humans,EXCEPT AFRICAN decent, have neanderthals genes left over from mating between two people in prehistoric time,do your research black people aren't neanderthals you are!!!!!!!!!

[aaliyah1604]

Some people are really ignorant and teach ignorance to others. We north african people have nothing to do whith whites. It was proven from most of the scientist. We are berber, that means that we are a mix between blacks and a tribe call numib (that doesnt exist no more) as well as arabs...sodont bs us please