Play
Upload

It's the Law ...

Ladyparts Justice Ladyparts Justice·3 videos
168

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
651,836
Like     Dislike 642

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Ladyparts Justice's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Ladyparts Justice's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Ladyparts Justice's video to your playlist.

Published on Oct 4, 2012

IT'S THE LAW PRODUCED BY LIZZ WINSTEAD
Since 2011 there have been hundreds of creepy laws passed that strip away a woman's right to privacy and access to healthcare. This is one of them. For the sake of your lady parts, vote this November.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (757)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Johan Delaney

    This video is fucking retarded

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Johan Delaney's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Johan Delaney's comment.
  • nickreilly72

    yea true. ill agree with your points. and eh idk about christian left. id say im still more right wing....im just not gona be a hypocrite and say im a christian who loves american values..but then goes out and talks bad about other peoples who arent like me. it really is just hypocrisy at the end of the day.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nickreilly72's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nickreilly72's comment.
    in reply to CallHeadquarters (Show the comment)
  • evan13579b

    You make a ridiculous accusation that republican lawmakers are saying explicitly racist things and then when I ask you what you back off.

    This is the problem and probably why you receive insults from people you argue against. If we were to continue to argue you'd probably bring that accusation back after not defending it like you've done with so many other "points".

    You are not treating your debate opponents with any respect so don't expect to receive any in return.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.
    in reply to CallHeadquarters (Show the comment)
  • CallHeadquarters

    LESS of a problem does not mean that the problem did not exist (and still exists) in huge quantities. If only 30% of the population is racist, but they are concentrated in specific areas, the local percentage is much higher than the natl. average. If it is no longer a 'problem' then the laws really don't bother anyone. The only people that would object would be racists who don't want to hire, or wish to underpay minorities. They don't concern me. I'll leave it to you to worry about them.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.
    in reply to evan13579b (Show the comment)
  • evan13579b

    The only reason we had enough people to vote for the civil rights act is because racism was becoming less of a problem. You ignore that fact.

    You can say "read" all you want. That is merely an accusation of ignorance (an insult) to paste over the fact that you can not manage to win an argument.

    I have read plenty. You need to re-examine the term consistency given that you accuse libertarians of being the ones who can use nothing but insults in an argument.

    Name one openly racist thing said.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.
    in reply to CallHeadquarters (Show the comment)
  • CallHeadquarters

    It didn't work before, and it won't work now. Especially with the way the extreme right has taken over, and openly say racist things, and people jump on and vote for them. Proof that people have not changed all that much in certain areas. The reason I say READ is because you need to understand the experience of those just a few years ago. You don't. And until you do, how can we discuss it? We have a different view of a good society, we will not agree, you work for your paradise, and I mine.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.
    in reply to evan13579b (Show the comment)
  • evan13579b

    You are ignoring my points and simply saying "Read More". That is not a constructive argument, it is you giving up and using a stupid tactic to try to save face. The only thing that deserves in response is an insult because that stupid tactic is an insult.

    Ya we talked about how capitalism handles those situations before. You were reduced to saying that it wouldn't work perfectly. Now you ignore that exchange and bring this back to demagogue prior to a retreat. Its quite pathetic.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.
    in reply to CallHeadquarters (Show the comment)
  • CallHeadquarters

    LOL. The argument is not reduced to 'you're being mean'. It is what it is. This is how Libertarians argue. Keep up the good fight. When your dreams come true, one day we may have cheap African American labor again, and women financially dependent on their men! Then we will know TRUE FREEDOM! LOL. Good luck with that!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.
    in reply to evan13579b (Show the comment)
  • evan13579b

    I first came up with a point that pointed out how stupid that was, and then you doubled down on it without showing why it is not stupid. With that you are not arguing and merely repeating yourself. At that moment calling that stupid is entirely appropriate. I'm sorry that this argument didn't go your way that you are reduced to saying that I shouldn't be so mean, and then repeating generalities like "you should read more", which are an insult in your case without a corresponding justification.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate evan13579b's comment.
    in reply to CallHeadquarters (Show the comment)
  • CallHeadquarters

    LOL. Well you go read some things, talk to some people, and get educated. Stop swallowing bumper sticker politics and delve a bit more deeply. Come up with a better point than 'stupid', perhaps you could read up on debate and supporting statements. Grow up a little, and perhaps we will converse again one day, when you leave Romper Room tactics behind. Live to fight another day.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CallHeadquarters's comment.
    in reply to evan13579b (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later