Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Emergence - Part 1B of ?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
265 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 5, 2008

Part 1B

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SpiritualAtheist)

  • talk about a cliffhanger ending!!!

    this is teatering off the edge of reality!!

    you've had me rethinking reality for a couple weeks, ive pretty much had to rethink everything, everyone who thought i was way out there before, thinks im just way too out of it now. but you are truly on to some things here. ive been looking into a lot of stuff related to this too. this is definitely a step past the forefront. i havent video responded because im still in thinking stage. Thanks!

  • Thanks for the reply. I am happy to see that my video is having the desired effect! And please, take your time on a response. I've beening wrestling with this weirdness for years.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Emergence - Part 1A of ?
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I found this to be a clear explanation. I am looking forward to watching the next videos on emergence.

  • Look up Vedanta Hinduism, Buddhism, or Process Theology/Philosophy. The base layer of reality is "experience", "God" or "Dharmakaya". Everything is ultimately a mental experience, not physical at all. The universe is in fact one giant intersubjective Mind looking at itself in an almost infinite number of ways.

  • And that universe exists objectively. Be it on a CD or in the mind of God. The question still is; where does subjectivity (the first person) come from????????????????? To me there is still a paradox.

  • If the blender, like the glass building, is only pixels on your computer screen...so what? It is still an 'objective' reality as it can be experienced by anyone and it's existence is compounded by all our different view points describing it perfectly. What I'm saying is your point, although I agree 100% doesn't make a difference to our 'subjective' realities. We are still locked in the compact disc. Just part of the ones and zeros of the universe.

  • You mention thoughts and feelings as being 'subjective' and the blender as being 'subjective' as well. But to me there is a very striking difference; my thoughts and feelings are mine and are unknowable to the 'outside world'. The blender on the other hand can be experienced by anyone.

  • There really is something out there, but what it truly is, we cant say. We can only model it in various ways, like 'car', 'combination of car parts' (chassis, motor etc), 'a collection of miniscule spheres' (ie atoms) or any way we find to be useful. All of the models above are mental, even the atom model. There is a real thing out there, independent of your experience, but its not a collection of atoms as you conceive of it. If it were, reality would be inconsistent! (We do not have a GUT yet.)

  • excellent parsing of experience, especially the analogy of the DVD containing the data and the Xbox reifying that data. Kinda like the Zero Point field containing all knowledge and our brains reifying that in chronological sequence, or something :-P ... I'm still working on this too... anyway, excellent effort

  • Damn this 500 character limit!

  • I think I understand at least part of what you're saying but I'm still confused.

    I understand that my perception of the world is subjective. A car is just a bunch of organized atoms and how it looks is just an interpretation created by my brain.

    However, the atoms are there and they are connected in a specific way that appears to me as a car.. but no matter how my brain would interpret it, it's still the same collection of atoms. So it's a real thing, independent of my experience.

  • (2/2) The whole idea can become more managable by the simple fact that 'virtual' is a short, well-known word. It's practically begging for being made philosophical use of! 'Virtual worlds' (as an alternative to 'perspective'), 'virtual selves' etc become very much easier to deal with, conceptually. The paradigm itself could be called 'virtualism'. What do you think?

    I'm looking forward to the next episode(s). Meanwhile, I'll be in your video archive!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more