I just want to say as impressive as the final drive against the giants was in the regular season, the game was tied so he didn't have much pressure to score
@GreenDay1981 doesn't matter how many times they were penalized fuckhead. it's how many times the other teams were penalized and what for. the incomplete pass rodgers threw against the 2nd Giants game when he got hit hard, was not a late hit. the fumble they did on the punt against the Lions, and against the Giants, was clearly a fumble even though it wasn't called one. calling TD's good when their receiver's didn't even had control when they went out of the endzone. Multiple examples shit face
@bigD2387 Multiple examples? All you did was bring up random regular season games but never said what plays in particular. Are you serious? That happened once in the playoff game and suddenly you say "everytime Rodgers throws an incomplete pass, it's a late hit"? So there were 159 late hit calls against Packers opponents? Wow. That's staggering. Again, retard, the Packers were 1 penalty call away from being tied for the most penalties in the NFL. Stupid fuck.
@GreenDay1981 No sight examples huh? I gave you multiple examples before, but you must've forgot about them already. So let me refresh your memory. Almost every time Rodgers threw an incomplete because he got hit, late hit. If the other team caught an amazing catch, pass interference. Rodgers gets sacked, "unnecessary" roughness. I could go on and on. Like I said it doesn't surprise me that a Packer fanboy is the only one that doesn't think the refs favored them. lol
@GreenDay1981 i have met some stubborn people in my day, but you take the cake. i actually looked at your argument and considered their validity in the beginning. that article about videotaping being legal from end zone to end zone was something you showed me and i learned something from it. i know this is the internet, but it would be courteous to acknowledge some arguments from your opponent. i just don't know why you're so angry/stubborn :(
@GreenDay1981 you still haven't proved to me or anyone that videotaping was the determining factor for why the pats won their superbowls. cowher and johnson said they did it. why is it that no former coaches have stated that the pats cheated to win their superbowls? did they lie? if so, what was their incentive to doing so? and goodel's sanctions do not prove that cheating occured. it was a pr stunt for all you know.
@binarystar300 You didn't explain shit. How would it make any sense for a defensive coordinator to videotape the opposing DEFENSE? So now the Packers do it? Do you have proof of this? No of course not. You're just going on the fact that our defensive coordinator was on the cheating Patriots before. Yeah real brilliant evidence there, Cochran. I guess since Jim Tressel is on the Colts's staff now, it must mean Colts players are selling merchandise for tattoos.
@GreenDay1981 your nitpicking is irritating, i already explained the overall point i was trying to make about the packers defense being better statistically than you claimed and how it related to capers and his knowledge of signal stealing. what this means to you, however, is that you have no right to criticize signal stealing when the pack and other teams do it as well. unless you want to call yourself a cheater, which i'm guessing you don't. get it now?
@binarystar300 It's not nearly in the top 10 either like you claimed. I knew the comparison would go right over your empty head. I implied that just because other people did it doesn't make it right. Get it now?
I just want to say as impressive as the final drive against the giants was in the regular season, the game was tied so he didn't have much pressure to score
quicksnipe23 2 hours ago
@GreenDay1981 doesn't matter how many times they were penalized fuckhead. it's how many times the other teams were penalized and what for. the incomplete pass rodgers threw against the 2nd Giants game when he got hit hard, was not a late hit. the fumble they did on the punt against the Lions, and against the Giants, was clearly a fumble even though it wasn't called one. calling TD's good when their receiver's didn't even had control when they went out of the endzone. Multiple examples shit face
bigD2387 5 hours ago
He did it against the Giants. Not in the play offs but in the regular season.
skywalker99686 17 hours ago
@bigD2387 Multiple examples? All you did was bring up random regular season games but never said what plays in particular. Are you serious? That happened once in the playoff game and suddenly you say "everytime Rodgers throws an incomplete pass, it's a late hit"? So there were 159 late hit calls against Packers opponents? Wow. That's staggering. Again, retard, the Packers were 1 penalty call away from being tied for the most penalties in the NFL. Stupid fuck.
GreenDay1981 4 days ago
@GreenDay1981 No sight examples huh? I gave you multiple examples before, but you must've forgot about them already. So let me refresh your memory. Almost every time Rodgers threw an incomplete because he got hit, late hit. If the other team caught an amazing catch, pass interference. Rodgers gets sacked, "unnecessary" roughness. I could go on and on. Like I said it doesn't surprise me that a Packer fanboy is the only one that doesn't think the refs favored them. lol
bigD2387 5 days ago
@GreenDay1981 i have met some stubborn people in my day, but you take the cake. i actually looked at your argument and considered their validity in the beginning. that article about videotaping being legal from end zone to end zone was something you showed me and i learned something from it. i know this is the internet, but it would be courteous to acknowledge some arguments from your opponent. i just don't know why you're so angry/stubborn :(
binarystar300 6 days ago
@GreenDay1981 you still haven't proved to me or anyone that videotaping was the determining factor for why the pats won their superbowls. cowher and johnson said they did it. why is it that no former coaches have stated that the pats cheated to win their superbowls? did they lie? if so, what was their incentive to doing so? and goodel's sanctions do not prove that cheating occured. it was a pr stunt for all you know.
binarystar300 6 days ago
@binarystar300 You didn't explain shit. How would it make any sense for a defensive coordinator to videotape the opposing DEFENSE? So now the Packers do it? Do you have proof of this? No of course not. You're just going on the fact that our defensive coordinator was on the cheating Patriots before. Yeah real brilliant evidence there, Cochran. I guess since Jim Tressel is on the Colts's staff now, it must mean Colts players are selling merchandise for tattoos.
GreenDay1981 6 days ago
@GreenDay1981 your nitpicking is irritating, i already explained the overall point i was trying to make about the packers defense being better statistically than you claimed and how it related to capers and his knowledge of signal stealing. what this means to you, however, is that you have no right to criticize signal stealing when the pack and other teams do it as well. unless you want to call yourself a cheater, which i'm guessing you don't. get it now?
binarystar300 6 days ago
@binarystar300 It's not nearly in the top 10 either like you claimed. I knew the comparison would go right over your empty head. I implied that just because other people did it doesn't make it right. Get it now?
GreenDay1981 6 days ago