Jean-Paul Sartre

Being-for-itself,ontology,
existentialism,phenomenonology,
philosophy

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Humanities
• Philosophy
• Jean-Paul
• Sartre
• existentialism

[digitalheir]

The background music is too loud and distracting. : (

[TrollCatcher2010]

@pugnaciousboxer2 what are "Immanuel Kant's a priori judgments"?

[TrollCatcher2010]

@jcjamrock "all philosophy begins with a question. " - a good statement, we could turn it into a question itself if we wished to dispute, "does all philosophy begins with a question..?" but that would be recursive, lets try

ok, so what is the first question?

perhaps i could suggest the first question is...

WHAT IS A QUESTION?

[TrollCatcher2010]

@LordOfTheShitHouse that is just being deliberately annoying, 100 miles is an old saying, pulling your man up on some quibble about that is just being fernickity and not engaging - you would be more honest to just say "fuck off" or not reply - the art of negative philosphi, to prove how cleverer u are than anybody by being able to disagree with whatever they say has been the main thing holding western philosophy back while western science strides ahead. extract the positive. philosophy starts w?

[TrollCatcher2010]

@LordOfTheShitHouse how about start with 1+1=2 and see if we can prove 2+2=4 and then ask how we KNOW this, but epistimolgy, the study of knowledge, is only one branch of philosphi

[TrollCatcher2010]

@jcjamrock descartes medititations are a good starting point, 6 meditations, the cogito is meditation 2 or 3, it is neither descartes start nor finish point so why should it be ours?

[TrollCatcher2010]

thanku4this

[pugnaciousboxer2]

How are Immanuel Kant's a priori judgments illogical? They actually make sense. A priori analytic statements are already thought in the subject (e.g., "all bachelors are unmarried"). The predicate doesn't amplify one's knowledge on the subject. A priori synthetic statements are more difficult to prove, hence why Kant made the Prolegomena.

[jcjamrock]

The a priori judgements of Immanuel Kant are also illogical.

[LordOfTheShitHouse]

the performative speech act of J.L. Austin, and the Judicative act of Edmund Husserl are also very illogical.