Re: The Random Ramblings of a Future Bibliomaniac

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
65 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 22, 2009

ビデオ カメラから直接アップロード

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very nice response.

  • B4. The USA's firefighting services, the USA's road system, & the U.K.'s running waterworks systems, all started out as private enterprises. Their being taken over by government had nothing to do with collectivization being more efficient & everything to do with Jim Taggart-type private interests appealing to collectivist cliches in order to successfully lobby for the establishment of mixed-economy regulations. They reduced their own private expenses by imposing those expenses on all taxpayers.

  • B3. Once the government forced all citizens to pay for fire-fighting agencies in taxes, the insurance companies felt free to say to purchasers of fire insurance: "Since your tax money already pays for the service of putting out your house's fire, our private insurance company doesn't have to pay for that." By getting governments to socialize fire-fighting services, insurance companies took that internal cost & then had it socialistically imposed on all taxpayers in society. To be continued...

  • B2. For that reason, most people had a strong financial incentive to purchase fire insurance, & insurance companies were, in monetary terms, the biggest clients of private fire-fighting service businesses. But insurance companies decided they could cut their own internal costs if they could get a certain government subsidy. They did this by lobbying governments to force all citizens to pay for socialized fire-fighting services. To be continued...

  • B1. By the way, I wouldn't be too hard on someone who assumed that fire-fighting service organizations wouldn't exist if not for taxes. That's very normal, because modern schools neglect to inform people about the fact that the 1st fire-fighting service organizations were private groups started by people like Benjamin Franklin. If your house was next to mine, & a fire started at your house & then spread to mine, I could hold you legally liable. To be continued...

  • Hooray! I'm happy to see you're back, uploading videos on your . . . bideo/video something-something abroad. ;-)

    Will this video have a "Video Response" link to strawberrycocoa/Telisha's video?

    I have to admit that Atlas didn't make an instant convert of me; after I finished it, I had to let the ideas gel with me before I read up more on Objectivism and found that I had to admit that it was a much better philosophy than the vague, vulgar welfare-statism of my elementary school days.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more