Destroying stuff with a paintball launcher capable of 1000fps.
ORIGINALLY HAD AUDIO, BUT YOUTUBE DISABLED IT DUE TO STUPID FUCKING WMG. I'M WORKING ON RE-EDITING ALL OF MY VIDEOS USING MUSIC LICEN...
Destroying stuff with a paintball launcher capable of 1000fps.
ORIGINALLY HAD AUDIO, BUT YOUTUBE DISABLED IT DUE TO STUPID FUCKING WMG. I'M WORKING ON RE-EDITING ALL OF MY VIDEOS USING MUSIC LICENSED BY NUCLEAR BLAST.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Ok, then u tell me they wreck the bottles. Thats why i added the deformation in the conservation of momentum. And not only the bottles get wrecked but shell of the paintball gets destroyed too..
Isn't that what i've been saying? You 've stated my proofs. :D
Please, do study the difference between statics and dynamics. You said you do not know the math needed to calculate this. Thats why im telling you... This is how.
Wow. First of all, its not the energy that is deformed. ITS THE OBJECT. Secondly, it doesn't deform into the surrounding air. IT DEFORMS ON THE INSTANT the two objects collide. Didn't the paintball splatter? So the shell Deformed from its original shape. Deformation DOESNT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH TIME. deformation depends onthe type of the material size and geometry of the object and the force applied. There is no such thing as deformation can not be performed fast enough.
How is your statement proven in the video when you clearly see that both objects were deformed?
You bring in statics and dynamics in the arguement when you don't even know their difference. You say deformation can't occur fast enough but you clearly see the two objects deformed?
Let's say even if there wasn't deformation. A frozen paintball would still be able to hit it with a greater force because it will resist air friction more as compared to the other one.
When did you join this argument in the first place. I'm talking about how the energy from the projectile gets transfered faster than the projectile can lose its energy by deformation.
Thats what you see in this video.
And i never said that energy was deformed, i said the projectile loses energy threw deformation into surrounding air.
How can you say it shows it in this video? Does it compare a frozen paintball and a non frozen one? Does this video state that theres such a thing that the energy from the projectile gets transfered faster than it can lose its energy?
What you need to understand is that force is independent to time. There's no such law in physics that you are talking about.
and the objects don't deform into the surrounding air. it deforms when the two objects collide. You give such vague statements.
What you need to understand is that this video shows how destructive liquid can be at high speed. And thats what i have been pointing out from the begging.
Also, i said the projectile deforms and releases energy into air, not that the objects deform into surrounding air. You read vague.
And in my last post i wrote it vague yes, but i meant
Threw deformation the energy gets transferd into the surrounding air.
As in:
The projectile loses energy threw deformation. The energy goes to the air.
Yeah thats true,but im not saying liquid isn't destructive. I'm saying that a frozen one is MORE destructive because theres much LESS deformation. You are right that it gets transfered into the surrounding air. But the energy gets coverted through several different ways then it goes through the air. A solid objects resists deformation more than a liquid object therefore more force is transfered. what your saying is right, just understand that deformation is independent of the time.
Obviously solid objects (mainly metals) are more destructive than liquids because they transfer more energy threw their properties and less deformation.
But i never claimed that wasn't true, i was just trying to point out to the guy i was arguing with above that you can't see the difference between the destruction of a solid or liquid in many cases because at certain speeds the whole logic of energy gets changed.
Same with speed and time, they also relate somehow.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Isn't that what i've been saying? You 've stated my proofs. :D
Please, do study the difference between statics and dynamics. You said you do not know the math needed to calculate this. Thats why im telling you... This is how.
The deformation of the projectile can not be preformed fast enough for the projectile energy to be deformed into surrounding air.
Thats proven in this video, how is that proving your statement.
You bring in statics and dynamics in the arguement when you don't even know their difference. You say deformation can't occur fast enough but you clearly see the two objects deformed?
Let's say even if there wasn't deformation. A frozen paintball would still be able to hit it with a greater force because it will resist air friction more as compared to the other one.
Thats what you see in this video.
And i never said that energy was deformed, i said the projectile loses energy threw deformation into surrounding air.
What you need to understand is that force is independent to time. There's no such law in physics that you are talking about.
and the objects don't deform into the surrounding air. it deforms when the two objects collide. You give such vague statements.
Also, i said the projectile deforms and releases energy into air, not that the objects deform into surrounding air. You read vague.
And in my last post i wrote it vague yes, but i meant
Threw deformation the energy gets transferd into the surrounding air.
As in:
The projectile loses energy threw deformation. The energy goes to the air.
But i never claimed that wasn't true, i was just trying to point out to the guy i was arguing with above that you can't see the difference between the destruction of a solid or liquid in many cases because at certain speeds the whole logic of energy gets changed.
Same with speed and time, they also relate somehow.