Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Jul 23, 2009
Kirk Sorensen's Tech Talk, delivered at Google on July 20, 2009.
Successfully developing a liquid-fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) would essentially solve our planets energy problems for thousands of years, because it would allow us to fully utilize the energy in natural thorium, which makes up 0.0012% of the Earths crust. Most of the research and development work for this technology was done by Oak Ridge National Labs back in the 50s and 60s. They were working to a different set of overall objectives, nevertheless, there are many lessons to be gleaned from their work that can help us to avoid pitfalls and develop LFTR into a high-performance, high-reliability power supply.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
23:53
Born of Nuclear Blast: Russia's Lakes of Mysteryby RussiaTodayFeatured
144,708
-
59:50
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Probby GoogleTechTalks
37,139 views
-
1:07:16
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Ideaby GoogleTechTalks
28,077 views
-
55:17
The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor: What Fusion Wanted To Beby GoogleTechTalks
183,395 views
-
1:32:43
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...by GoogleTechTalks
55,804 views
-
67
videos
Play all
Nuclear Power-Liquid Thorium Fuel-Good!by K4Fusion
-
1:34
LFTR Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor question to President Obamaby hallezb
5,906 views
-
0:54
Thorium Reactor Question to President Obamaby hallezb
12,525 views
-
6:53
India's experimental Thorium Fuel Cycle Nuclear Reactor [NDTV Report]by Luptonga
55,579 views
-
29:01
THE THORIUM PROBLEM - Danger of existing thorium regulation to U.S. manufacturing and energy sectorby gordonmcdowell
48,478 views
-
1:59:59
Everything you need to Know Nukeular reator Liquid fluoride thorium reactor Nuclearby steelrain420
2,033 views
-
29:33
Bill Gates on energy: Innovating to zero!by TEDtalksDirector
571,332 views
-
28:26
Motherboard TV: The Thorium Dream (Documentary)by MotherboardTV
129,248 views
-
5:06
LFTRs in 5 minutes - Thorium Reactorsby 123ross456
885,278 views
-
1:37:13
Kirk Sorensen @ MRU on LFTR - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby gordonmcdowell
30,388 views
-
8:41
Simi Valley Nuclear Disasterby Michael Freudiger
177,331 views
-
3:17
Thorium fuel of the future. Safe, abundant, dense. Russia Todayby Rick Maltese
9,401 views
-
1:59:59
LFTR in 5 Minutes - THORIUM REMIX 2011by NinjaGetsuga
16,937 views
-
1:09
1_Minute_LFTR_Thorium_Plantby ThoriumAlliance
18,206 views
-
8:56
ADSR Energy from Thoriumby energyamplifier
8,198 views
-
3:41
Thorium Revolt: Mineral to replace uranium as nuclear power source?by RussiaToday
27,351 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
OfficeThug 4 months ago
Working in the nuclear industry is one of the healthiest professions on earth. You get checked very frequently for diseases and the early development of cancers, so much so that natural ailments are also detected and can be treated before it's too late.
Nuclear kills statistically less than wind and solar per TWh (including Chernobyl deaths). You need to mine more, build more, and maintain more things with wind and solar to make the same amount of electricity, which means more accidents.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MrDanP1 1 month ago
Solar still requires backup fossil fuel generation...especially if we switch from internal combustion engine driven cars to electric vehicles. Worldwide, the nuclear power industry has a much better safety record than the various fossil fuel industries (See 1998 Paul Scherrer Institute Report comparing accidents and fatalities across the energy sector from 1969 to 1996. Hydroelectric actually has the worst safety record). Solar will NEVER have the capacity to replace fossil fuels, the least
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (254)
EmGooser 1 week ago
Just look at mykmlr's comments, they are just trolling. Regardless of what you say he will spout out something in retort regardless if it is true or not. For example saying lead being so corrosive it is cost prohibitive (even though it is used today as radiation shielding) to just tasteless insults. Review his comment history of yourself.
The best way to handle a troll is to ignore them.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
itscrazytrevor 1 week ago
I don't want to even get out of bed unless my alarm clock is Thorium powered!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Colin Dempsey 2 weeks ago
Anyway, getting governments to pay for the research and development is the real stop.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 2 weeks ago
Tell that to the NRC which declares 8 ppb as the lifetime maximum surviveable level.
Looks like you lie again!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Evito Cruor 2 weeks ago
0.1% Pu waste will put out so little amount of radiation that your cellular walls will prevent all alpha radiation, almost all of beta and gamma radiation at those levels will not cause significant amounts of mutations or cell destruction. .001% of mercury in current fish near europe is a vast underestimation. You dont even fucking google your idiocy. Its rather hard to accumulate enough plutonium to get more effects than living near a hill does. Mercury will harm you a lot easier and quicker.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 2 weeks ago
I'm off to bed evito you fucking shill for Exxon. Solar or die. Do the economics of 90000 years of storage AND GUARDING from the 'terraists' then get back to us.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 2 weeks ago
Yucca Flats is what happens when 90000 year storage meets NIMBY. The whole project was doomed by the idiots who said nuclear power could be safely stored at the reactor site...a la fukushima.
Face it, you fucked up, Fukushima Dai Ichi was just the lid going on the garbage can, but it is on, and tightly.
As for being a solution, you might as Nuclear France why they had to shut down 1/3 of capacity in the hot summer last year due to water temp.
Ooopps. Worthless tech. SOlar or die.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Evito Cruor 2 weeks ago
Yucca flats is stupidity compounded by corrupt interest. The whole project was doomed by all the competent scientists it was showed to before construction ever began. Zero proof that you cannot manage the materials when you cite an example that was known to be stupid before it was ever started.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 2 weeks ago
Coal mines don't keep making more toxins as time goes by, nor is the .001% mercury even a fraction as deadly as the .1% Pu left in high-level waste.
Sounds like you have LOTS more lies to tell.
Solar or die as a technological civilization, solar or die.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Evito Cruor 2 weeks ago
Because theyre doing it assbackwards at Hanford, they didnt want to acknowledge the stupidity of liquids near storage then. They dont want to do it now either. Proper drystorage with stable element containment with 5% maximum amount of Pu at given mass of material is an infinitely secure storage that cannot under ANY circumstance go critical let alone supercritical.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube