Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Farah: Federal Government Had Serious Questions About Obama's Citizenship Since He Was Born

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,716
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 9, 2011

World Net Daily's Joseph Farah: The federal government had serious questions about Obama's citizenship since he was born and began investigating it when he was 5 years old. 5/9/2011 - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -

http://www.BirtherReport.com -

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/terry-lakin-action-fund-r... -

http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/radio

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @KenyanImport LOL. It's a tyrannical action on Obama's part. The man is a tyrant, pure and simple.

  • Obama sending a man to prison over his fraudulent birth certificate is a "gutsy move".

see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obama is cornered and is willing to do anything to save himself.

  • @SuperCaduceus dumbass he was born in the usa to an american mother so he is american and his wife is african american .

  • @witchtelus I surmise that nearly 2 millions bucks spent on a legal team by obomo

    has helped to keep this issue from being adjudicated. Whadya think bozo?

  • So, let me get this straight...the BC Obama released showed his father as a foreign national, but 'everyone' claims that he is an American citizen because of his mother's nationality. Okay, now I understand! That means he's White!

    Use their logic in any other setting, and it falls apart.  Typical Liberal stuff.

  • Why is the issue being debated? The guy is a fraud, he posted it on the net, what more is needed to prosecute this criminal?

  • @SuperCaduceus Boy I wish I had you teaching my military law classes when I was in the Army. The JAG who taught them was under the mistaken impression that soldiers could only refuse an order that was illegal "on it's face". Just think, back when the DS was making me do pushups. I could have saved myself a lot of trouble just by demanding to see the President's BC

    But then every arm chair riding Birther knows everything better than any legal and constitutional expert in the entire US.... right?

  • @Sonatafool Furthermore. if you think you know the law better than every single recognized and credentialed constitutional expert in the US, why don't you take it to court. Oh yeah, birthers have 81 times. What's the score so far?

    Birthers 0

    Reality 81

    Of course if you knew anything about the law you'd realize only Congress has the jurisdiction to remove a sitting POTUS. So why don't you get your Republican Majority Congress? Oh yeah, even Republicans aren't interested in your delusions. Fail

  • @Sonatafool Nice cherry picking, but you conveniently left out 2 items M v H.

    1. Just. Waite also noted "Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents."

    2. Waite also noted that the case did not answer whether NBC required citizen parents since the plaintiff had citizen parents.

    The only precedent setting case that made that distinction was US v Wong Kim Ark. No citzen parent required, You fail

  • @witchtelus The Constitution is paramount. As understood by its framers, Chief Justice Morrison Waite in Minor v. Happerstt explained: ". At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country OF PARENTS WHO WERE ITS CITIZENS became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens." Obama was never eligible because of his British father.

  • @ConcernedONETOO Nice ploy... fallacy of shifting the goalposts.

    No the Constitution and requirements are paramount, which is why Obama could be legally elected POTUS; he satisfies those requirements.

    The problem with birthers is that they only pretend to honor the Constitution, while actually seeking to undermine democracy by overthrowing the legally elected POTUS.... and makebelieving they are the "real" patriots.

    "“When facism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag..." S. Lewis

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more