SEPTEMBER CLUES A

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website
http://www.septemberclues.info

The SEPTEMBER CLUES forum
http://www.cluesforum.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.

The forensic analysis of the LIVE TV images leaves no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.

The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites - yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. In fact, several electronic disruptions occured in NYC on the day : scores of testimonies reported jammed cellphones and, notoriously, the breakdown of the NYFD firefighters' radio communications was a cause of great concern and outrage. The WTC towers' internal communication system was also inexplicably blacked out.

Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort - not a large 'passenger airliner'. Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible. The unescapable fact is that the television images of 9/11 did not depict the real events of that fateful day. The mainstream media's involvement on 9/11 is the unspeakable truth of our times.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[zincink]

All major networks have antennae on the roof of the WTC - your blackout occurs when the plane hits. That is all.

[simonshack]

Nope - wrong tower. The TV antenna was on the roof of WTC1. Is this your best and most pondered comment after watching September Clues?

[Caroline Louise]

I read a debunking of the nose-out image issue that claimed you used anti-aliasing to smooth both nose-in and nose-out images to make them seem more alike than they are in the raw footage, is that in fact true?

[simonshack]

Hi Caroline - and thanks for your question. No, I did nothing to alter the shape of the images of nose-in and nose-out to make them seem more alike. What I did though, was to use what is called a 'bump map' on the nose-out image - in order to compare the two by superimposing one over the other. This only makes the nose-out image more grainy - but does not alter its shape in any way.

Please go to 4min50sec of this video to see what I mean:

NOSED OUT : watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ

[justaglowin]

why are there fucking dislikes?

[simonshack]

mumpo101: So not only did you see the 2nd plane hitting the south side of WTC2 from three blocks away (to the north of the WTC? At street level?) - but your uncle's co-worker and your friend's father - a firefighter - perished that day. All right. Now, may I ask you why on Earth you fail to mention the names of these two alleged victims/ heroes of 9/11? If I were you, this would be the very 1st thing I would do - in order to respectfully honor the memories of my lost friends or acquaintances.

[simonshack]

Luck and love to you too! 'Thanks' for waking up to the real world! :O)

[SimsulatedId]

I spent time looking at '9/11', beginning to realise the unlikelihoods, but ruled out 'no planes' for months before finally having a look; totally shocked, somewhat scared, weirded out. Took more months to come to terms with the sheer audacity of the fakers - I mean, repsect where it's due, hats off to them. Had another look at moonlandings soon after... The world's never felt so real! Luck and love to you.

[TakeWiseAction]

if the plane shown at 5:35 in the footage was a "graphic image of an airplane", and if this imagery display was a mistake, then why would the programmed image not show the wings after the nose of the plane protrudes from the exit point? did they programmers purposely make the image not have wingspan after impact ? to have a controlled awakening? Im not bashing you by the way, this is one of my favorite videos, im just confused, i would truly appreciate a response to my questions . thanks

[Leonardo Smith]

3:47 - Is this too much of a coincidence? They zoom in right before the 2nd ' plane' is about to collide with the tower. Also, what's with the black out?

[Leonardo Smith]

2:56 - I don't understand why ' Theresa' would say ' another plane just hit ' if she never mentioned a plane in the first place. She mentioned before that there was an explosion but that's it..

[mark h.]

something is terribly wrong in this world we "live in".

im 45 and if someone had told me that i would start to question reality the way i currently do...i would say your mad!

but im afraid thats true

reporting of strange events throughout the world are tinted,warped ridiculed even ignored.people are not all nut cases or attention seekers....

just 1% need to be telling the truth ... that means something more sinister is at work in our reality.

i fear i dont know what that reality is anymore.

[John James]

PLEASE DONT AIR THIS IN TV OTHERWISE THIS WORLD WILL BURN IN FLAMES IN A BLOODY REVOLUTION!

[mattread1000]

Wow your government actually committed genocide.